Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Bot or Human? Detecting ChatGPT Imposters with A Single Question

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.06424 v4 pith:GB7U2LN4 submitted 2023-05-10 cs.CL

Bot or Human? Detecting ChatGPT Imposters with A Single Question

classification cs.CL
keywords botshumanlanguagequestionsingledetectingdifficulteasy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 have recently demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language understanding and generation. However, there is a concern that they can be misused for malicious purposes, such as fraud or denial-of-service attacks. Therefore, it is crucial to develop methods for detecting whether the party involved in a conversation is a bot or a human. In this paper, we propose a framework named FLAIR, Finding Large Language Model Authenticity via a Single Inquiry and Response, to detect conversational bots in an online manner. Specifically, we target a single question scenario that can effectively differentiate human users from bots. The questions are divided into two categories: those that are easy for humans but difficult for bots (e.g., counting, substitution, searching, and ASCII art reasoning), and those that are easy for bots but difficult for humans (e.g., memorization and computation). Our approach shows different strengths of these questions in their effectiveness, providing a new way for online service providers to protect themselves against nefarious activities. Our code and question set are available at https://github.com/hongwang600/FLAIR.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Broken Gates: Re-evaluating Web Bot Defenses in the Age of LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Commercial solvers defeat puzzle captchas at near-perfect rates for pennies per thousand, while reCAPTCHA v3's resistance comes from browser-environment authenticity, not human-like behavior.

  2. The Dawn of LMMs: Preliminary Explorations with GPT-4V(ision)

    cs.CV 2023-09 conditional novelty 4.0

    GPT-4V processes interleaved image-text inputs generically and supports visual referring prompting for new human-AI interaction.