REVIEW 2 cited by
Scratch Copilot Evaluation: Assessing AI-Assisted Creative Coding for Families
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Scratch Copilot Evaluation: Assessing AI-Assisted Creative Coding for Families
read the original abstract
How can AI enhance creative coding experiences for families? This study explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) in helping families with creative coding using Scratch. Based on our previous user study involving a prototype AI assistant, we devised three evaluation scenarios to determine if LLMs could help families comprehend game code, debug programs, and generate new ideas for future projects. We utilized 22 Scratch projects for each scenario and generated responses from LLMs with and without practice tasks, resulting in 120 creative coding support scenario datasets. In addition, the authors independently evaluated their precision, pedagogical value, and age-appropriate language. Our findings show that LLMs achieved an overall success rate of more than 80\% on the different tasks and evaluation criteria. This research offers valuable information on using LLMs for creative family coding and presents design guidelines for future AI-supported coding applications. Our evaluation framework, together with our labeled evaluation data, is publicly available.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ViScratch: Using Large Language Models and Gameplay Videos for Automated Feedback in Scratch
A multimodal LLM system that diagnoses Scratch bugs from code plus gameplay video reported 100% repair success on ten curated tasks, far above text-only ChatGPT baselines.
-
EmbeddedKittens: An Evaluation of Code Embeddings for Scratch
Structure-aware embeddings such as GGNN transfer to Scratch and can support sprite naming and, with weaker evidence, correctness and progress prediction.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.