Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Malicious or Benign? Towards Effective Content Moderation for Children's Videos

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.15551 v1 pith:GPV2JYDW submitted 2023-05-24 cs.CV cs.SI

Malicious or Benign? Towards Effective Content Moderation for Children's Videos

classification cs.CV cs.SI
keywords contentmaliciousvideoschildrenmoderationvideobenignplatforms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Online video platforms receive hundreds of hours of uploads every minute, making manual content moderation impossible. Unfortunately, the most vulnerable consumers of malicious video content are children from ages 1-5 whose attention is easily captured by bursts of color and sound. Scammers attempting to monetize their content may craft malicious children's videos that are superficially similar to educational videos, but include scary and disgusting characters, violent motions, loud music, and disturbing noises. Prominent video hosting platforms like YouTube have taken measures to mitigate malicious content on their platform, but these videos often go undetected by current content moderation tools that are focused on removing pornographic or copyrighted content. This paper introduces our toolkit Malicious or Benign for promoting research on automated content moderation of children's videos. We present 1) a customizable annotation tool for videos, 2) a new dataset with difficult to detect test cases of malicious content and 3) a benchmark suite of state-of-the-art video classification models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Child-Oriented AIGC Video Risk Reviewing: A Benchmark and Knowledge-Supported Iterative Reasoning Framework

    cs.CV 2026-07 reject novelty 6.0

    A multi-agent iterative-questioning framework plus a 605-video benchmark for detecting developmentally inappropriate risks in AI-generated children's videos.