Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Prompt- and Trait Relation-aware Cross-prompt Essay Trait Scoring

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.16826 v1 pith:XNSYGL2V submitted 2023-05-26 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords traitessaycross-promptessaysmodelpromptscoringtraits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated essay scoring (AES) aims to score essays written for a given prompt, which defines the writing topic. Most existing AES systems assume to grade essays of the same prompt as used in training and assign only a holistic score. However, such settings conflict with real-education situations; pre-graded essays for a particular prompt are lacking, and detailed trait scores of sub-rubrics are required. Thus, predicting various trait scores of unseen-prompt essays (called cross-prompt essay trait scoring) is a remaining challenge of AES. In this paper, we propose a robust model: prompt- and trait relation-aware cross-prompt essay trait scorer. We encode prompt-aware essay representation by essay-prompt attention and utilizing the topic-coherence feature extracted by the topic-modeling mechanism without access to labeled data; therefore, our model considers the prompt adherence of an essay, even in a cross-prompt setting. To facilitate multi-trait scoring, we design trait-similarity loss that encapsulates the correlations of traits. Experiments prove the efficacy of our model, showing state-of-the-art results for all prompts and traits. Significant improvements in low-resource-prompt and inferior traits further indicate our model's strength.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FeedEval: Pedagogically Aligned Evaluation of LLM-Generated Essay Feedback

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FeedEval uses three fine-tuned 3B LLM evaluators to filter synthetic essay feedback; filtered high-quality feedback improves essay-scoring training and small-LLM revisions compared with low-quality feedback.

Pith tools