Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

MathChat: Converse to Tackle Challenging Math Problems with LLM Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.01337 v3 pith:HRTWGDDR submitted 2023-06-02 cs.CL stat.ML

MathChat: Converse to Tackle Challenging Math Problems with LLM Agents

classification cs.CL stat.ML
keywords problemsmathagentsmathchatagentlanguagellmsproblem-solving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Employing Large Language Models (LLMs) to address mathematical problems is an intriguing research endeavor, considering the abundance of math problems expressed in natural language across numerous science and engineering fields. LLMs, with their generalized ability, are used as a foundation model to build AI agents for different tasks. In this paper, we study the effectiveness of utilizing LLM agents to solve math problems through conversations. We propose MathChat, a conversational problem-solving framework designed for math problems. MathChat consists of an LLM agent and a user proxy agent which is responsible for tool execution and additional guidance. This synergy facilitates a collaborative problem-solving process, where the agents engage in a dialogue to solve the problems. We perform evaluation on difficult high school competition problems from the MATH dataset. Utilizing Python, we show that MathChat can further improve previous tool-using prompting methods by 6%.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. PRIMETIME : Limits of LLMs in Temporal Primitives

    cs.NE 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    PRIMETIME generator reveals that LLM datetime parsing and arithmetic primitives are individually unreliable but fully learnable via fine-tuning, enabling frontier-level accuracy on event planning with small LoRA models.

  2. Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A warm-start error-injection pipeline yields 12,326 golden-labeled multimodal agent failures, and current LLMs remain weak at step-and-mode failure attribution.

  3. World model inspired sarcasm reasoning with large language model agents

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    WM-SAR decomposes sarcasm into LLM-agent components, quantifies literal-normative inconsistency deterministically, and integrates it with intention via logistic regression to outperform prior sarcasm detectors on benchmarks.

  4. Double-Edged Sword or Sharp Tool? Designing and Evaluating Triadic LLM-Teacher Collaboration for K-12 Writing at Scale

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A two-year deployment across 120 schools shows that LLM-teacher collaboration improves K-12 writing quality via labor division, with a ceiling effect from excessive LLM linguistic expansion.

  5. Teaching Astronomy with Large Language Models

    physics.ed-ph 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Structured integration of LLMs in astronomy education, including a domain-specific tutor and documentation requirements, leads to improved AI literacy and reduced student reliance on AI over the semester.