REVIEW 1 cited by
Towards Theory-based Moral AI: Moral AI with Aggregating Models Based on Normative Ethical Theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Towards Theory-based Moral AI: Moral AI with Aggregating Models Based on Normative Ethical Theory
read the original abstract
Moral AI has been studied in the fields of philosophy and artificial intelligence. Although most existing studies are only theoretical, recent developments in AI have made it increasingly necessary to implement AI with morality. On the other hand, humans are under the moral uncertainty of not knowing what is morally right. In this paper, we implement the Maximizing Expected Choiceworthiness (MEC) algorithm, which aggregates outputs of models based on three normative theories of normative ethics to generate the most appropriate output. MEC is a method for making appropriate moral judgments under moral uncertainty. Our experimental results suggest that the output of MEC correlates to some extent with commonsense morality and that MEC can produce equally or more appropriate output than existing methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Bounded Morality: Defining the Space of Moral Computation
Finite agents face an unavoidable breadth-depth tradeoff in moral computation, so ethical theories are resource strategies and AI alignment requires capacity scaling, not human imitation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.