REVIEW 2 cited by
Generative Flow Networks: a Markov Chain Perspective
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Generative Flow Networks: a Markov Chain Perspective
read the original abstract
While Markov chain Monte Carlo methods (MCMC) provide a general framework to sample from a probability distribution defined up to normalization, they often suffer from slow convergence to the target distribution when the latter is highly multi-modal. Recently, Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) have been proposed as an alternative framework to mitigate this issue when samples have a clear compositional structure, by treating sampling as a sequential decision making problem. Although they were initially introduced from the perspective of flow networks, the recent advances of GFlowNets draw more and more inspiration from the Markov chain literature, bypassing completely the need for flows. In this paper, we formalize this connection and offer a new perspective for GFlowNets using Markov chains, showing a unifying view for GFlowNets regardless of the nature of the state space as recurrent Markov chains. Positioning GFlowNets under the same theoretical framework as MCMC methods also allows us to identify the similarities between both frameworks, and most importantly to highlight their
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Your GFlowNet Secretly Learns an Optimal Transport Plan
Minimum-flow GFlowNets on graphs encode optimal transport plans, with the learned policy recovering the optimal coupling between source and target distributions.
-
Stop the Sampler! Classifier-Based Adaptive Stopping for Sampling Kernels
Classifier-based adaptive stopping, trained as a non-acyclic GFlowNet, shortens MCMC trajectories while preserving or improving sample quality relative to ULA and diffusion-sampler baselines.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.