REVIEW 3 cited by
Feature Transportation Improves Graph Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown remarkable success in learning representations for graph-structured data. However, GNNs still face challenges in modeling complex phenomena that involve feature transportation. In this paper, we propose a novel GNN architecture inspired by Advection-Diffusion-Reaction systems, called ADR-GNN. Advection models feature transportation, while diffusion captures the local smoothing of features, and reaction represents the non-linear transformation between feature channels. We provide an analysis of the qualitative behavior of ADR-GNN, that shows the benefit of combining advection, diffusion, and reaction. To demonstrate its efficacy, we evaluate ADR-GNN on real-world node classification and spatio-temporal datasets, and show that it improves or offers competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art networks.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
What Can We Learn From MIMO Graph Convolutions?
Localized MIMO graph convolutions (LMGCs) generalize many linear message-passing GNNs and are provably injective and produce linearly independent representations for almost every edge weight choice.
-
Resolving Oversmoothing with Opinion Dissensus
BIMP, a continuous-depth GNN based on nonlinear opinion dynamics, is shown to avoid oversmoothing when its constant input has unique entries, and it outperforms baselines on ten node-classification datasets.
-
Towards Data-centric Machine Learning on Directed Graphs: a Survey
A survey taxonomizing directed graph neural networks into message-passing, eigenpolynomial, and sequence-based frameworks and re-reading them from a data-centric perspective.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.