REVIEW 3 cited by
Average-Hard Attention Transformers are Constant-Depth Uniform Threshold Circuits
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Transformers have emerged as a widely used neural network model for various natural language processing tasks. Previous research explored their relationship with constant-depth threshold circuits, making two assumptions: average-hard attention and logarithmic precision for internal computations relative to input length. Merrill et al. (2022) prove that average-hard attention transformers recognize languages that fall within the complexity class TC0, denoting the set of languages that can be recognized by constant-depth polynomial-size threshold circuits. Likewise, Merrill and Sabharwal (2023) show that log-precision transformers recognize languages within the class of uniform TC0. This shows that both transformer models can be simulated by constant-depth threshold circuits, with the latter being more robust due to generating a uniform circuit family. Our paper shows that the first result can be extended to yield uniform circuits as well.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
A First-Principles Theory of Slow Thinking and Active Perception
Active lifting of data distributions via latent-sequence sampling and max-rate uncertainty reduction formally derives slow-thinking LLMs and places them on representation and sampler hierarchies that can be climbed.
-
On the Ability of Transformers to Verify Plans
Decoder-only transformers provably length-generalize on verifying plans in delete-free/well-formed domains via C*-RASP membership, but fail on general STRIPS and conditional effects.
-
BAR Conjecture: the Feasibility of Inference Budget-Constrained LLM Services with Authenticity and Reasoning
A purported impossibility theorem for LLM services reduces to the paper's own assumption that reasoning and authenticity necessarily consume extra inference budget.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.