Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Learning Techniques in Extreme Weather Events: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.10995 v1 pith:TJ3NJYSE submitted 2023-08-18 physics.ao-ph cs.LG

Deep Learning Techniques in Extreme Weather Events: A Review

classification physics.ao-ph cs.LG
keywords weatherdeeplearningeventsextremereviewtechniquesfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Extreme weather events pose significant challenges, thereby demanding techniques for accurate analysis and precise forecasting to mitigate its impact. In recent years, deep learning techniques have emerged as a promising approach for weather forecasting and understanding the dynamics of extreme weather events. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art deep learning in the field. We explore the utilization of deep learning architectures, across various aspects of weather prediction such as thunderstorm, lightning, precipitation, drought, heatwave, cold waves and tropical cyclones. We highlight the potential of deep learning, such as its ability to capture complex patterns and non-linear relationships. Additionally, we discuss the limitations of current approaches and highlight future directions for advancements in the field of meteorology. The insights gained from this systematic review are crucial for the scientific community to make informed decisions and mitigate the impacts of extreme weather events.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When LLM Meets Time Series: Can LLMs Perform Multi-Step Time Series Reasoning and Inference

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    TSAIA, a new benchmark, tests eight LLMs on 1,054 multi-step time series tasks and finds they cannot reliably complete the required workflows.