The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2308.15136 · v2 · pith:6VKRHJWR · submitted 2023-08-29 · cs.DS · cs.CV· cs.DB· cs.DC· cs.IR

CAGRA: Highly Parallel Graph Construction and Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search for GPUs

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:6VKRHJWRrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.DS cs.CVcs.DBcs.DCcs.IR
keywords fastergraphmethodsearchapproximatehnswnearestneighbor
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search (ANNS) plays a critical role in various disciplines spanning data mining and artificial intelligence, from information retrieval and computer vision to natural language processing and recommender systems. Data volumes have soared in recent years and the computational cost of an exhaustive exact nearest neighbor search is often prohibitive, necessitating the adoption of approximate techniques. The balanced performance and recall of graph-based approaches have more recently garnered significant attention in ANNS algorithms, however, only a few studies have explored harnessing the power of GPUs and multi-core processors despite the widespread use of massively parallel and general-purpose computing. To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel parallel computing hardware-based proximity graph and search algorithm. By leveraging the high-performance capabilities of modern hardware, our approach achieves remarkable efficiency gains. In particular, our method surpasses existing CPU and GPU-based methods in constructing the proximity graph, demonstrating higher throughput in both large- and small-batch searches while maintaining compatible accuracy. In graph construction time, our method, CAGRA, is 2.2~27x faster than HNSW, which is one of the CPU SOTA implementations. In large-batch query throughput in the 90% to 95% recall range, our method is 33~77x faster than HNSW, and is 3.8~8.8x faster than the SOTA implementations for GPU. For a single query, our method is 3.4~53x faster than HNSW at 95% recall.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TileMaxSim: IO-Aware GPU MaxSim Scoring with Dimension Tiling and Fused Product Quantization

    cs.IR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    TileMaxSim delivers IO-aware Triton kernels that reach 80% of peak HBM bandwidth for exact MaxSim scoring via multi-query tiling, dimension tiling, and fused product quantization, yielding 220x speedup over naive loop...

  2. When More Cores Hurts: The Vector Database Scaling Paradox in HPC

    cs.DC 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Large-scale HPC evaluation of Qdrant, Milvus, and Weaviate reveals that workload patterns limit scaling and extra cores can reduce throughput, exposing a cloud-to-HPC design mismatch.