REVIEW 1 cited by
Simple LLM Prompting is State-of-the-Art for Robust and Multilingual Dialogue Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Simple LLM Prompting is State-of-the-Art for Robust and Multilingual Dialogue Evaluation
read the original abstract
Despite significant research effort in the development of automatic dialogue evaluation metrics, little thought is given to evaluating dialogues other than in English. At the same time, ensuring metrics are invariant to semantically similar responses is also an overlooked topic. In order to achieve the desired properties of robustness and multilinguality for dialogue evaluation metrics, we propose a novel framework that takes advantage of the strengths of current evaluation models with the newly-established paradigm of prompting Large Language Models (LLMs). Empirical results show our framework achieves state of the art results in terms of mean Spearman correlation scores across several benchmarks and ranks first place on both the Robust and Multilingual tasks of the DSTC11 Track 4 "Automatic Evaluation Metrics for Open-Domain Dialogue Systems", proving the evaluation capabilities of prompted LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Evaluating Zero-Shot and One-Shot Adaptation of Small Language Models in Leader-Follower Interaction
Fine-tuned Qwen2.5-0.5B classifies leader-follower roles with 86.66% accuracy in single-turn interactions, but accuracy falls to chance in one-shot multi-turn interactions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.