Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.03433 v1 pith:YUK4BE3D submitted 2023-09-07 cs.CL

Improving Open Information Extraction with Large Language Models: A Study on Demonstration Uncertainty

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsrelationstaskconfidencedemonstrationenhanceextractionimproving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Open Information Extraction (OIE) task aims at extracting structured facts from unstructured text, typically in the form of (subject, relation, object) triples. Despite the potential of large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT as a general task solver, they lag behind state-of-the-art (supervised) methods in OIE tasks due to two key issues. First, LLMs struggle to distinguish irrelevant context from relevant relations and generate structured output due to the restrictions on fine-tuning the model. Second, LLMs generates responses autoregressively based on probability, which makes the predicted relations lack confidence. In this paper, we assess the capabilities of LLMs in improving the OIE task. Particularly, we propose various in-context learning strategies to enhance LLM's instruction-following ability and a demonstration uncertainty quantification module to enhance the confidence of the generated relations. Our experiments on three OIE benchmark datasets show that our approach holds its own against established supervised methods, both quantitatively and qualitatively.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TRIAGE: Trustworthy Retrieval Instrumentation And Graph Evaluation

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    TRIAGE instruments Graph-RAG with gold-free stage metrics and a usage-time diagnostic chain that localizes failures to extraction, graph/schema, or retrieval levers.