REVIEW 2 cited by
Data Commons
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Publicly available data from open sources (e.g., United States Census Bureau (Census), World Health Organization (WHO), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)) are vital resources for policy makers, students and researchers across different disciplines. Combining data from different sources requires the user to reconcile the differences in schemas, formats, assumptions, and more. This data wrangling is time consuming, tedious and needs to be repeated by every user of the data. Our goal with Data Commons (DC) is to help make public data accessible and useful to those who want to understand this data and use it to solve societal challenges and opportunities. We do the data processing and make the processed data widely available via standard schemas and Cloud APIs. Data Commons is a distributed network of sites that publish data in a common schema and interoperate using the Data Commons APIs. Data from different Data Commons can be joined easily. The aggregate of these Data Commons can be viewed as a single Knowledge Graph. This Knowledge Graph can then be searched over using Natural Language questions utilizing advances in Large Language Models. This paper describes the architecture of Data Commons, some of the major deployments and highlights directions for future work.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Beyond Context Limits: Subconscious Threads for Long-Horizon Reasoning
Structured recursive reasoning with dynamic KV-cache pruning preserves accuracy on math and research benchmarks while using less than half the cache of the full output.
-
Truth Sleuth and Trend Bender: AI Agents to fact-check YouTube videos and influence opinions
A prototype two-agent system using RAG fact-checking and self-evaluating comment generation can label claims and post comments on YouTube, but its headline accuracy rests on filtered data and a mismatched comparison.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.