Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.15325 v5 pith:P32K67VL submitted 2023-09-27 cs.LG physics.comp-ph

classification cs.LGphysics.comp-ph
keywords neuraloperatorsdesigncomputationaldomaindomainsexistingexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Scientific discovery and engineering design are currently limited by the time and cost of physical experiments, selected mostly through trial-and-error and intuition that require deep domain expertise. Numerical simulations present an alternative to physical experiments but are usually infeasible for complex real-world domains due to the computational requirements of existing numerical methods. Artificial intelligence (AI) presents a potential paradigm shift by developing fast data-driven surrogate models. In particular, an AI framework, known as Neural Operators, presents a principled framework for learning mappings between functions defined on continuous domains, e.g., spatiotemporal processes and partial differential equations (PDE). They can extrapolate and predict solutions at new locations unseen during training, i.e., perform zero-shot super-resolution. Neural Operators can augment or even replace existing simulators in many applications, such as computational fluid dynamics, weather forecasting, and material modeling, while being 4-5 orders of magnitude faster. Further, Neural Operators can be integrated with physics and other domain constraints enforced at finer resolutions to obtain high-fidelity solutions and good generalization. Since Neural Operators are differentiable, they can directly optimize parameters for inverse design and other inverse problems. We believe that Neural Operators present a transformative approach to simulation and design, enabling rapid research and development.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Computational Math with Neural Networks is Hard

    math.NA 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under SETH, approximating integrals, Poisson solutions, or matrix-vector products for neural network inputs requires runtime at least accuracy^{-1+o(1)}.

  2. Solving engineering eigenvalue problems with neural networks using the Rayleigh quotient

    math.NA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A neural network method using the Rayleigh quotient with Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization solves differential eigenvalue problems in order, including parametric, nonlinear, and high-dimensional cases.

  3. Toward a Robust and Generalizable Metamaterial Foundation Model

    cs.CE 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MetaFO is a prompt-based transformer that performs forward prediction, missing-data reconstruction, noise filtering, and inverse design for one family of 10,230 FEM-simulated metamaterial unit cells.

Pith tools