REVIEW 2 cited by
On the accuracy and efficiency of group-wise clipping in differentially private optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances have substantially improved the accuracy, memory cost, and training speed of differentially private (DP) deep learning, especially on large vision and language models with millions to billions of parameters. In this work, we thoroughly study the per-sample gradient clipping style, a key component in DP optimization. We show that different clipping styles have the same time complexity but instantiate an accuracy-memory trade-off: while the all-layer clipping (of coarse granularity) is the most prevalent and usually gives the best accuracy, it incurs heavier memory cost compared to other group-wise clipping, such as the layer-wise clipping (of finer granularity). We formalize this trade-off through our convergence theory and complexity analysis. Importantly, we demonstrate that the accuracy gap between group-wise clipping and all-layer clipping becomes smaller for larger models, while the memory advantage of the group-wise clipping remains. Consequently, the group-wise clipping allows DP optimization of large models to achieve high accuracy and low peak memory simultaneously.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
FlashDP: Private Training Large Language Models with Efficient DP-SGD
FlashDP fuses per-sample gradient computation, norm calculation, clipping, and noise addition into a cache-friendly block-wise all-reduce workflow that avoids explicit per-sample gradient storage and redundant recomputation.
-
Towards Robust Fact-Checking: A Multi-Agent System with Advanced Evidence Retrieval
A multi-agent LLM pipeline with credibility-filtered full-text web retrieval reports better fact-checking F1 than four baselines on small benchmark subsamples.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.