Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

TACNET: Temporal Audio Source Counting Network

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.02369 v1 pith:JU2TU5HE submitted 2023-11-04 cs.SD cs.AIcs.LGeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.AIcs.LGeess.AS
keywords audiocountingtacnetsourcenetworktaskstemporalaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we introduce the Temporal Audio Source Counting Network (TaCNet), an innovative architecture that addresses limitations in audio source counting tasks. TaCNet operates directly on raw audio inputs, eliminating complex preprocessing steps and simplifying the workflow. Notably, it excels in real-time speaker counting, even with truncated input windows. Our extensive evaluation, conducted using the LibriCount dataset, underscores TaCNet's exceptional performance, positioning it as a state-of-the-art solution for audio source counting tasks. With an average accuracy of 74.18 percentage over 11 classes, TaCNet demonstrates its effectiveness across diverse scenarios, including applications involving Chinese and Persian languages. This cross-lingual adaptability highlights its versatility and potential impact.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Strategic Alignment Patterns in National AI Policies

    cs.CY 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A policy-analysis preprint scores alignment between objectives, foresight, and instruments in 15-20 national AI strategies, claiming distinct governance-based archetypes, but ships no data, figures, or code to support...

  2. Optical Physics-Based Generative Models

    physics.optics 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Optical wave equations are claimed to work as generative models with big efficiency gains, but the derivations contain algebraic sign errors and the reported FID scores are mutually inconsistent.

Pith tools