REVIEW 3 cited by
VLM-Eval: A General Evaluation on Video Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
VLM-Eval: A General Evaluation on Video Large Language Models
read the original abstract
Despite the rapid development of video Large Language Models (LLMs), a comprehensive evaluation is still absent. In this paper, we introduce a unified evaluation that encompasses multiple video tasks, including captioning, question and answering, retrieval, and action recognition. In addition to conventional metrics, we showcase how GPT-based evaluation can match human-like performance in assessing response quality across multiple aspects. We propose a simple baseline: Video-LLaVA, which uses a single linear projection and outperforms existing video LLMs. Finally, we evaluate video LLMs beyond academic datasets, which show encouraging recognition and reasoning capabilities in driving scenarios with only hundreds of video-instruction pairs for fine-tuning. We hope our work can serve as a unified evaluation for video LLMs, and help expand more practical scenarios. The evaluation code will be available soon.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CREward: A Type-Specific Creativity Reward Model
CREward, trained only on Gemma-3-generated preference labels, predicts geometry/material/texture creativity rankings that correlate moderately with human designer judgments on a five-object benchmark.
-
TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?
TempCompass benchmark reveals that state-of-the-art Video LLMs have poor ability to perceive temporal aspects such as speed, direction, and ordering in videos.
-
NeMo: Needle in a Montage for Video-Language Understanding
NeMoBench, an automatically generated benchmark with 31,378 QA pairs, shows that video LLMs struggle with temporal grounding of relevant clips hidden in long montages.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.