Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The PAU Survey: Photometric redshift estimation in deep wide fields

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.07581 v1 pith:VHA3QIEW submitted 2023-12-10 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM

The PAU Survey: Photometric redshift estimation in deep wide fields

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IM
keywords textrmphoto-fieldsredshiftredshiftsbcnzdeeppaus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present photometric redshifts (photo-$z$) for the deep wide fields of the Physics of the Accelerating Universe Survey (PAUS), covering an area of $\sim$50 deg$^{2}$, for $\sim$1.8 million objects up to $i_{\textrm{AB}}<23$. The PAUS deep wide fields overlap with the W1 and W3 fields from CFHTLenS and the G09 field from KiDS/GAMA. Photo-$z$ are estimated using the 40 narrow bands (NB) of PAUS and the broad bands (BB) of CFHTLenS and KiDS. We compute the redshifts with the SED template-fitting code BCNZ, with a modification in the calibration technique of the zero-point between the observed and the modelled fluxes, that removes any dependence on spectroscopic redshift samples. We enhance the redshift accuracy by introducing an additional photo-$z$ estimate ($z_{\textrm{b}}$), obtained through the combination of the BCNZ and the BB-only photo-$z$. Comparing with spectroscopic redshifts estimates ($z_{\textrm{s}}$), we obtain a $\sigma_{68} \simeq 0.019$ for all galaxies with $i_{\textrm{AB}}<23$ and a typical bias $|z_{\textrm{b}}-z_{\textrm{s}}|$ smaller than 0.01. For $z_{\textrm{b}} \sim (0.10-0.75)$ we find $\sigma_{68} \simeq (0.003-0.02)$, this is a factor of $10-2$ higher accuracy than the corresponding BB-only results. We obtain similar performance when we split the samples into red (passive) and blue (active) galaxies. We validate the redshift probability $p(z)$ obtained by BCNZ and compare its performance with that of $z_{\textrm{b}}$. These photo-$z$ catalogues will facilitate important science cases, such as the study of galaxy clustering and intrinsic alignment at high redshifts ($z \lesssim 1$) and faint magnitudes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim++ Lens Sample

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    DES Y6 calibrates MagLim++ lens galaxy redshift distributions to 1-2% mean accuracy using SOM-based photometric redshifts plus clustering redshifts, with uncertainties compressed into a few modes.