REVIEW 1 cited by
Benchmarking with MIMIC-IV, an irregular, spare clinical time series dataset
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Benchmarking with MIMIC-IV, an irregular, spare clinical time series dataset
read the original abstract
Electronic health record (EHR) is more and more popular, and it comes with applying machine learning solutions to resolve various problems in the domain. This growing research area also raises the need for EHRs accessibility. Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) dataset is a popular, public, and free EHR dataset in a raw format that has been used in numerous studies. However, despite of its popularity, it is lacking benchmarking work, especially with recent state of the art works in the field of deep learning with time-series tabular data. The aim of this work is to fill this lack by providing a benchmark for latest version of MIMIC dataset, MIMIC-IV. We also give a detailed literature survey about studies that has been already done for MIIMIC-III.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CLIR-Bench: Benchmarking Multimodal Question Answering over Irregular Clinical Time Series
CLIR-Bench shows generalist and time-series LLMs struggle to ground clinical answers in sparse irregular ICU evidence, with top accuracy near 50% and weak causal evidence use.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.