Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rethinking Explainable Machine Learning as Applied Statistics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.02870 v5 pith:DNU7Z6FP submitted 2024-02-05 cs.LG

Rethinking Explainable Machine Learning as Applied Statistics

classification cs.LG
keywords statisticsappliedexplainablelearningmachinealgorithmsexplanationsliterature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the rapidly growing literature on explanation algorithms, it often remains unclear what precisely these algorithms are for and how they should be used. In this position paper, we argue for a novel and pragmatic perspective: Explainable machine learning needs to recognize its parallels with applied statistics. Concretely, explanations are statistics of high-dimensional functions, and we should think about them analogously to traditional statistical quantities. Among others, this implies that we must think carefully about the matter of interpretation, or how the explanations relate to intuitive questions that humans have about the world. The fact that this is scarcely being discussed in research papers is one of the main drawbacks of the current literature. Moving forward, the analogy between explainable machine learning and applied statistics suggests fruitful ways for how research practices can be improved.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The Age of AI Agents Demands A New Scientific Paradigm To Sustain Trustworthy Science

    cs.CY 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    AI research agents remove the human accountability backstop that prior science verification relied on, so the paper proposes observable-by-default workflows, tiered verification, and AI attribution standards to preser...