REVIEW 2 cited by
A Change Detection Reality Check
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In recent years, there has been an explosion of proposed change detection deep learning architectures in the remote sensing literature. These approaches claim to offer state-of-the-art performance on different standard benchmark datasets. However, has the field truly made significant progress? In this paper we perform experiments which conclude a simple U-Net segmentation baseline without training tricks or complicated architectural changes is still a top performer for the task of change detection.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Be the Change You Want to See: Revisiting Remote Sensing Change Detection Practices
A simple, well-optimized model (BTC) beats or matches state-of-the-art change detection methods on six datasets, indicating that fundamental design choices matter more than architectural novelty.
-
Leveraging Satellite Image Time Series for Accurate Extreme Event Detection
SITS-Extreme detects extreme events by learning patch representations from a satellite image time series via autoencoding with contrastive and consistency losses, then thresholding the mean cosine distance between pre...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.