Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Lying Blindly: Bypassing ChatGPT's Safeguards to Generate Hard-to-Detect Disinformation Claims

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.08467 v2 pith:HOBD5ZXX submitted 2024-02-13 cs.CL

Lying Blindly: Bypassing ChatGPT's Safeguards to Generate Hard-to-Detect Disinformation Claims

classification cs.CL
keywords claimsdisinformationchatgptgenerateauthorshipeventgpt-3knowledge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

As Large Language Models become more proficient, their misuse in coordinated disinformation campaigns is a growing concern. This study explores the capability of ChatGPT with GPT-3.5 to generate short-form disinformation claims about the war in Ukraine, both in general and on a specific event, which is beyond the GPT-3.5 knowledge cutoff. Unlike prior work, we do not provide the model with human-written disinformation narratives by including them in the prompt. Thus the generated short claims are hallucinations based on prior world knowledge and inference from the minimal prompt. With a straightforward prompting technique, we are able to bypass model safeguards and generate numerous short claims. We compare those against human-authored false claims on the war in Ukraine from ClaimReview, specifically with respect to differences in their linguistic properties. We also evaluate whether AI authorship can be differentiated by human readers or state-of-the-art authorship detection tools. Thus, we demonstrate that ChatGPT can produce realistic, target-specific disinformation claims, even on a specific post-cutoff event, and that they cannot be reliably distinguished by humans or existing automated tools.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Tailored untruths: How personalisation challenges LLM safeguards

    cs.CL 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    A 1.6-million-text study of eight LLMs in four languages finds that adding demographic personae to disinformation prompts raises jailbreak rates from 78% to 82%.