Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Benchmarking Data Science Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.17168 v1 pith:VDTQK5XS submitted 2024-02-27 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords datascienceagentsanalysisbenchmarkingevaluationnoveladvanced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the era of data-driven decision-making, the complexity of data analysis necessitates advanced expertise and tools of data science, presenting significant challenges even for specialists. Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as promising aids as data science agents, assisting humans in data analysis and processing. Yet their practical efficacy remains constrained by the varied demands of real-world applications and complicated analytical process. In this paper, we introduce DSEval -- a novel evaluation paradigm, as well as a series of innovative benchmarks tailored for assessing the performance of these agents throughout the entire data science lifecycle. Incorporating a novel bootstrapped annotation method, we streamline dataset preparation, improve the evaluation coverage, and expand benchmarking comprehensiveness. Our findings uncover prevalent obstacles and provide critical insights to inform future advancements in the field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DSMentor: Enhancing Data Science Agents with Curriculum Learning and Online Knowledge Accumulation

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Ordering data science problems easy-to-hard and accumulating their solutions in a memory buffer improves LLM agent pass rates on DSEval and QRData by up to 5.2%.

  2. Evolutionary Perspectives on the Evaluation of LLM-Based AI Agents: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies AI agent evaluation benchmarks along environment and capability axes, and proposes five traits that distinguish agents from chatbots.

Pith tools