REVIEW 1 cited by
An Empirical Study of the Influence of Adversarial Fine-Tuning on Compressed Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
An Empirical Study of the Influence of Adversarial Fine-Tuning on Compressed Neural Networks
read the original abstract
As deep learning (DL) models are increasingly being integrated into our everyday lives, ensuring their safety by making them robust against adversarial attacks has become increasingly critical. DL models have been found to be susceptible to adversarial attacks by introducing small, targeted perturbations to disrupt the input data. Adversarial training has been presented as a mitigation strategy that can result in more robust models. This adversarial robustness comes with additional computational costs required to design adversarial attacks during training. The two objectives -- adversarial robustness and computational efficiency -- then appear to be in conflict with each other. In this work, we explore the effects of neural network compression on adversarial robustness. We specifically explore the effects of fine-tuning on compressed models, and present the trade-off between standard fine-tuning and adversarial fine-tuning. Our results show that adversarial fine-tuning of compressed models can yield large improvements to their robustness performance. We present experiments on several benchmark datasets showing that adversarial fine-tuning of compressed models can achieve robustness performance comparable to adversarially trained models, while also improving computational efficiency. Source code is available here: https://github.com/saintslab/Adver-Fine.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Breaking TinyML: Why Quantized Neural Networks Need Domain-Specific Security Analysis
Surrogate extraction followed by FGSM/PGD reduces int-8 TinyML accuracy by up to 47% on CIFAR-10 with 50k queries, outperforming gray-box baselines and exposing hardware-specific QNN vulnerabilities.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.