Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MisGUIDE : Defense Against Data-Free Deep Learning Model Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.18580 v1 pith:5IYZ2FXU submitted 2024-03-27 cs.CR

MisGUIDE : Defense Against Data-Free Deep Learning Model Extraction

classification cs.CR
keywords modellearningmodelsqueriesdefenseframeworkmisguidequery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The rise of Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) has led to the widespread deployment of machine learning models trained on diverse datasets. These models are employed for predictive services through APIs, raising concerns about the security and confidentiality of the models due to emerging vulnerabilities in prediction APIs. Of particular concern are model cloning attacks, where individuals with limited data and no knowledge of the training dataset manage to replicate a victim model's functionality through black-box query access. This commonly entails generating adversarial queries to query the victim model, thereby creating a labeled dataset. This paper proposes "MisGUIDE", a two-step defense framework for Deep Learning models that disrupts the adversarial sample generation process by providing a probabilistic response when the query is deemed OOD. The first step employs a Vision Transformer-based framework to identify OOD queries, while the second step perturbs the response for such queries, introducing a probabilistic loss function to MisGUIDE the attackers. The aim of the proposed defense method is to reduce the accuracy of the cloned model while maintaining accuracy on authentic queries. Extensive experiments conducted on two benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly enhances the resistance against state-of-the-art data-free model extraction in black-box settings.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ADS-C: Antidistillation Sampling for Classification

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    ADS-C perturbs served classification probabilities under a per-input margin budget, preserving every top-1 prediction while degrading distilled students by 13–30 percentage points.

  2. Stabilizing Data-Free Model Extraction

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    MetaDFME stabilizes data-free model extraction by training the generator with Reptile-style meta-learning, achieving higher and less oscillating substitute accuracy.