REVIEW 1 cited by
Measuring the Exploitation of Weaknesses in the Wild
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Measuring the Exploitation of Weaknesses in the Wild
read the original abstract
Identifying the software weaknesses exploited by attacks supports efforts to reduce developer introduction of vulnerabilities and to guide security code review efforts. A weakness is a bug or fault type that can be exploited through an operation that results in a security-relevant error. Ideally, the security community would measure the prevalence of the software weaknesses used in actual exploitation. This work advances that goal by introducing a simple metric that utilizes public data feeds to determine the probability of a weakness being exploited in the wild for any 30-day window. The metric is evaluated on a set of 130 weaknesses that were commonly found in vulnerabilities between April 2021 and March 2024. Our analysis reveals that 92 % of the weaknesses are not being constantly exploited.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Vul4Py: Benchmarking Automated Vulnerability Repair in Python with Paired Exploit and Functional Oracles
Vul4Py gives 100 real Python vulnerabilities a paired exploit-and-functional oracle, and on this benchmark agentic repair systems outperform direct prompting and a specialized tool by a wide margin.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.