Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

OLAPH: Improving Factuality in Biomedical Long-form Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12701 v3 pith:WQMIBJAB submitted 2024-05-21 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords factualityframeworkllmsmedicalolaphanswersclaimsdomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In the medical domain, numerous scenarios necessitate the long-form generation ability of large language models (LLMs). Specifically, when addressing patients' questions, it is essential that the model's response conveys factual claims, highlighting the need for an automated method to evaluate those claims. Thus, we introduce MedLFQA, a benchmark dataset reconstructed using long-form question-answering datasets related to the biomedical domain. We use MedLFQA to facilitate a cost-effective automatic evaluations of factuality. We also propose OLAPH, a simple and novel framework that utilizes cost-effective and multifaceted automatic evaluation to construct a synthetic preference set and answers questions in our preferred manner. Our framework leads us to train LLMs step-by-step to reduce hallucinations and include crucial medical claims. We highlight that, even on evaluation metrics not used during training, LLMs trained with our OLAPH framework demonstrate significant performance improvement in factuality. Our findings reveal that a 7B LLM trained with our OLAPH framework can provide long answers comparable to the medical experts' answers in terms of factuality. We believe that our work could shed light on gauging the long-text generation ability of LLMs in the medical domain. Our code and datasets are available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automatic Evaluation of Healthcare LLMs Beyond Question-Answering

    cs.CL 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    In healthcare LLM evaluation, multiple-choice accuracy and open-ended task scores correlate only weakly, and the paper's proposed Relaxed Perplexity metric aims to improve open-ended factuality scoring but rests on an...

  2. Response Quality Assessment for Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Conditional Conformal Factuality

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Conformal-RAG applies conformal prediction with a retrieval-based relevance score to guarantee the factuality of retained sub-claims in RAG responses.

  3. Large Language Models for Cancer Communication: Evaluating Linguistic Quality, Safety, and Accessibility in Generative AI

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    General-purpose LLMs outperformed specialized medical LLMs on linguistic quality and emotional engagement for breast and cervical cancer questions, while medical models were simpler to read but scored worse on safety.

  4. Harnessing RLHF for Robust Unanswerability Recognition and Trustworthy Response Generation in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    SALU, a multi-task fine-tuning and confidence-guided RLHF method, reduces hallucinated answers on unanswerable Chinese CIR questions to 1.3 percent on the authors' private dataset.

  5. The Aloe Family Recipe for Open and Specialized Healthcare LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Aloe Beta, a family of open-weights health LLMs built from Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5, matches or exceeds closed medical models on MCQA benchmarks while improving safety via DPO.

  6. MedBioLM: Optimizing Medical and Biological QA with Fine-Tuned Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2025-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning GPT-4o on biomedical QA datasets improves accuracy on MedQA, PubMedQA, and BioASQ, while RAG adds little once fine-tuning is applied.

Pith tools