Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Rethinking the Vulnerabilities of Face Recognition Systems:From a Practical Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.12786 v3 pith:R5INABPV submitted 2024-05-21 cs.CR

Rethinking the Vulnerabilities of Face Recognition Systems:From a Practical Perspective

classification cs.CR
keywords attacksbackdoorsystemsvulnerabilitiesadversarialattackstudiesdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Face Recognition Systems (FRS) have increasingly integrated into critical applications, including surveillance and user authentication, highlighting their pivotal role in modern security systems. Recent studies have revealed vulnerabilities in FRS to adversarial (e.g., adversarial patch attacks) and backdoor attacks (e.g., training data poisoning), raising significant concerns about their reliability and trustworthiness. Previous studies primarily focus on traditional adversarial or backdoor attacks, overlooking the resource-intensive or privileged-manipulation nature of such threats, thus limiting their practical generalization, stealthiness, universality and robustness. Correspondingly, in this paper, we delve into the inherent vulnerabilities in FRS through user studies and preliminary explorations. By exploiting these vulnerabilities, we identify a novel attack, facial identity backdoor attack dubbed FIBA, which unveils a potentially more devastating threat against FRS:an enrollment-stage backdoor attack. FIBA circumvents the limitations of traditional attacks, enabling broad-scale disruption by allowing any attacker donning a specific trigger to bypass these systems. This implies that after a single, poisoned example is inserted into the database, the corresponding trigger becomes a universal key for any attackers to spoof the FRS. This strategy essentially challenges the conventional attacks by initiating at the enrollment stage, dramatically transforming the threat landscape by poisoning the feature database rather than the training data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Lilith: Backdoor Generalization under Training-Inference Trigger Shift

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A single poisoned training trigger can create a backdoor that fires for a whole family of unseen inference-time triggers, provided the variants preserve the anchor's representation geometry.

  2. Decision-Level Hijacking: Injecting Cognitive Bias into Large Language Models via Bit-Flip Attacks

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A handful of weight-bit flips (as few as 12) can bias LLM outputs toward a target entity or stance, with limited effect on non-target tasks and output distributions.