Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Correlation Coefficients

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.16469 v1 pith:7IGMXV7L submitted 2024-05-26 math.ST stat.TH

On Correlation Coefficients

classification math.ST stat.TH
keywords correlationcoefficientcoefficientsbehaviorpearsonquestionspearmanstatistical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In the present paper, we discuss the Pearson, Spearman, Kendall correlation coefficients and their statistical analogues. We propose a new correlation coefficient r and its statistical analogue. The coefficient r is based on Kendal's and Spearman's correlation coefficients. A new extension of the Pearson correlation coefficient is also discussed. We conduct simulation experiments and study the behavior of the above correlation coefficients. We observe that the behavior of Pearson's sample correlation coefficient can be very different from the behavior of the rank correlation coefficients, which, in turn, behave in a similar way. The question arises: which correlation coefficient better measures the dependence rate? We try to answer this question in the final conclusion.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Speech DF Arena: A Leaderboard for Speech DeepFake Detection Models

    cs.SD 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Speech DF Arena standardizes audio deepfake detection benchmarking across 14 datasets and 15 systems, showing that most open-source detectors have high error rates on out-of-domain attacks.