REVIEW 2 cited by
Noisy Annotations in Semantic Segmentation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Obtaining accurate labels for instance segmentation is particularly challenging due to the complex nature of the task. Each image necessitates multiple annotations, encompassing not only the object class but also its precise spatial boundaries. These requirements elevate the likelihood of errors and inconsistencies in both manual and automated annotation processes. By simulating different noise conditions, we provide a realistic scenario for assessing the robustness and generalization capabilities of instance segmentation models in different segmentation tasks, introducing COCO-N and Cityscapes-N. We also propose a benchmark for weakly annotation noise, dubbed COCO-WAN, which utilizes foundation models and weak annotations to simulate semi-automated annotation tools and their noisy labels. This study sheds light on the quality of segmentation masks produced by various models and challenges the efficacy of popular methods designed to address learning with label noise.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Novel Method to Evaluate Models on Unreliable, Noisy and Inconsistent Labels: Adaptive Resolution Label Aggregation (ARLA)
Adaptive Resolution Label Aggregation (ARLA) coarsens label and prediction together at chosen subpatch size and sensitivity so evaluation metrics better reflect true model error on noisy segmentation labels.
-
CUPID: Evaluating Personalized and Contextualized Alignment of LLMs from Interactions
The abstract claims that state-of-the-art LLMs fail to infer contextual preferences from multi-turn interactions (under 50% precision, 65% recall), but the body text is an unrelated adversarial-patch paper, leaving th...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.