Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CoMT: Chain-of-Medical-Thought Reduces Hallucination in Medical Report Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11451 v4 pith:O6CKSWJT submitted 2024-06-17 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords medicalreportcomtdiagnosisdiagnosticgenerationchain-of-medical-thoughtclinical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic medical report generation (MRG), which possesses significant research value as it can aid radiologists in clinical diagnosis and report composition, has garnered increasing attention. Despite recent progress, generating accurate reports remains arduous due to the requirement for precise clinical comprehension and disease diagnosis inference. Furthermore, owing to the limited accessibility of medical data and the imbalanced distribution of diseases, the underrepresentation of rare diseases in training data makes large-scale medical visual language models (LVLMs) prone to hallucinations, such as omissions or fabrications, severely undermining diagnostic performance and further intensifying the challenges for MRG in practice. In this study, to effectively mitigate hallucinations in medical report generation, we propose a chain-of-medical-thought approach (CoMT), which intends to imitate the cognitive process of human doctors by decomposing diagnostic procedures. The radiological features with different importance are structured into fine-grained medical thought chains to enhance the inferential ability during diagnosis, thereby alleviating hallucination problems and enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of MRG. The code and dataset have been released at https://github.com/FRENKIE-CHIANG/CoMT.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MI-CXR: A Benchmark for Longitudinal Reasoning over Multi-Interval Chest X-rays

    cs.CV 2026-05 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    MI-CXR is a new benchmark that shows state-of-the-art vision-language models achieve only 29.3% accuracy on longitudinal reasoning tasks across multi-visit chest X-ray sequences.

  2. MMedPO: Aligning Medical Vision-Language Models with Clinical-Aware Multimodal Preference Optimization

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MMedPO weights preference-optimization training samples by clinical relevance scores, combining hallucinated text answers and locally noised lesion images, and reports improved medical VQA and report generation metrics.

  3. Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.

Pith tools