Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MMedPO: Aligning Medical Vision-Language Models with Clinical-Aware Multimodal Preference Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.06141 v4 pith:ZVNQROOR submitted 2024-12-09 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords preferencemedicalmmedpooptimizationalignmentmed-lvlmsclinicalmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advancement of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) has propelled their application in the medical field. However, Medical LVLMs (Med-LVLMs) encounter factuality challenges due to modality misalignment, where the models prioritize textual knowledge over visual input, leading to hallucinations that contradict information in medical images. Previous attempts to enhance modality alignment in Med-LVLMs through preference optimization have inadequately mitigated clinical relevance in preference data, making these samples easily distinguishable and reducing alignment effectiveness. To address this challenge, we propose MMedPO, a novel multimodal medical preference optimization approach that considers the clinical relevance of preference samples to enhance Med-LVLM alignment. MMedPO curates multimodal preference data by introducing two types of dispreference: (1) plausible hallucinations injected through target Med-LVLMs or GPT-4o to produce medically inaccurate responses, and (2) lesion region neglect achieved through local lesion-noising, disrupting visual understanding of critical areas. We then calculate clinical relevance for each sample based on scores from multiple Med-LLMs and visual tools, and integrate these scores into the preference optimization process as weights, enabling effective alignment. Our experiments demonstrate that MMedPO significantly enhances factual accuracy in Med-LVLMs, achieving substantial improvements over existing preference optimization methods by averaging 14.2% and 51.7% across the Med-VQA and report generation tasks. Our code are available in https://github.com/aiming-lab/MMedPO.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CheXPO: Preference Optimization for Chest X-ray VLMs with Counterfactual Rationale

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A preference optimization strategy using confidence-based hard example mining, similarity retrieval, and synthetic counterfactual rationales improves chest X-ray VQA accuracy by 8.93% relative over supervised fine-tuning.

  2. HSCR: Hierarchical Self-Contrastive Rewarding for Aligning Medical Vision Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HSCR uses visual token dropout and logit contrast to construct self-generated dispreferred answers, then trains a medical VLM with explicit and implicit preference losses, improving zero-shot Rad-VQA, SLAKE, and PathV...

Pith tools