REVIEW 1 cited by
Predicting User Perception of Move Brilliance in Chess
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Predicting User Perception of Move Brilliance in Chess
read the original abstract
AI research in chess has been primarily focused on producing stronger agents that can maximize the probability of winning. However, there is another aspect to chess that has largely gone unexamined: its aesthetic appeal. Specifically, there exists a category of chess moves called ``brilliant" moves. These moves are appreciated and admired by players for their high intellectual aesthetics. We demonstrate the first system for classifying chess moves as brilliant. The system uses a neural network, using the output of a chess engine as well as features that describe the shape of the game tree. The system achieves an accuracy of 79% (with 50% base-rate), a PPV of 83%, and an NPV of 75%. We demonstrate that what humans perceive as ``brilliant" moves is not merely the best possible move. We show that a move is more likely to be predicted as brilliant, all things being equal, if a weaker engine considers it lower-quality (for the same rating by a stronger engine). Our system opens the avenues for computer chess engines to (appear to) display human-like brilliance, and, hence, creativity.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Three-Body Alignment: Aligning Chess Agent with Human Reasoning through Reranked Rationale
Reranking retrieved grandmaster rationales by FEN similarity raises a chess LLM's semantic alignment with grandmaster explanations from 0.61 to 0.73 cosine similarity, while reducing tactical quality.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.