Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Predicting User Perception of Move Brilliance in Chess

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11895 v1 pith:R6XQHZGR submitted 2024-06-14 cs.AI

Predicting User Perception of Move Brilliance in Chess

classification cs.AI
keywords chessmovesbrilliantsystemenginemovebrilliancedemonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

AI research in chess has been primarily focused on producing stronger agents that can maximize the probability of winning. However, there is another aspect to chess that has largely gone unexamined: its aesthetic appeal. Specifically, there exists a category of chess moves called ``brilliant" moves. These moves are appreciated and admired by players for their high intellectual aesthetics. We demonstrate the first system for classifying chess moves as brilliant. The system uses a neural network, using the output of a chess engine as well as features that describe the shape of the game tree. The system achieves an accuracy of 79% (with 50% base-rate), a PPV of 83%, and an NPV of 75%. We demonstrate that what humans perceive as ``brilliant" moves is not merely the best possible move. We show that a move is more likely to be predicted as brilliant, all things being equal, if a weaker engine considers it lower-quality (for the same rating by a stronger engine). Our system opens the avenues for computer chess engines to (appear to) display human-like brilliance, and, hence, creativity.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Three-Body Alignment: Aligning Chess Agent with Human Reasoning through Reranked Rationale

    cs.GT 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Reranking retrieved grandmaster rationales by FEN similarity raises a chess LLM's semantic alignment with grandmaster explanations from 0.61 to 0.73 cosine similarity, while reducing tactical quality.