REVIEW 1 cited by
Using conditional GANs for convergence map reconstruction with uncertainties
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Using conditional GANs for convergence map reconstruction with uncertainties
read the original abstract
Understanding the large-scale structure of the Universe and unravelling the mysteries of dark matter are fundamental challenges in contemporary cosmology. Reconstruction of the cosmological matter distribution from lensing observables, referred to as 'mass-mapping' is an important aspect of this quest. Mass-mapping is an ill-posed problem, meaning there is inherent uncertainty in any convergence map reconstruction. The demand for fast and efficient reconstruction techniques is rising as we prepare for upcoming surveys. We present a novel approach which utilises deep learning, in particular a conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN), to approximate samples from a Bayesian posterior distribution, meaning they can be interpreted in a statistically robust manner. By combining data-driven priors with recent regularisation techniques, we introduce an approach that facilitates the swift generation of high-fidelity, mass maps. Furthermore, to validate the effectiveness of our approach, we train the model on mock COSMOS-style data, generated using Colombia Lensing's kappaTNG mock weak lensing suite. These preliminary results showcase compelling convergence map reconstructions and ongoing refinement efforts are underway to enhance the robustness of our method further.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Replicating weak-lensing summary-statistic covariances with normalizing flows
Normalizing flows trained on weak-lensing convergence maps reproduce mean and variance of summary statistics to percent level but underestimate off-diagonal covariance by up to 25% unless data augmentation and noise i...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.