Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Comparative Analysis of Jet and Underlying Event Properties Across Various Models as a Function of Charged Particle Multiplicity at 7 TeV

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17384 v1 pith:ULOUGI5G submitted 2024-06-25 hep-ph hep-ex

Comparative Analysis of Jet and Underlying Event Properties Across Various Models as a Function of Charged Particle Multiplicity at 7 TeV

classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords chargedepos4hydroeposlhcdataflowparticleparticles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study, a comprehensive analysis of jets and underlying events as a function of charged particle multiplicity in proton-proton (pp) collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV is presented. Various Monte Carlo (MC) event generators, including Pythia8.308, EPOS1.99, EPOSLHC, EPOS4$_{Hydro}$, and EPOS4$_{noHydro}$, are employed to predict particle production. The predictions from these models are compared with experimental data from the CMS collaboration. The charged particles are categorized into those associated with underlying events and those linked to jets. The analysis is restricted to charged particles with $|\eta| < 2.4$ and $p_{T} > 0.25$ GeV/c. Upon comparing the MC predictions with CMS data, it is observed that EPOS$4_{Hydro}$, EPOSLHC, and Pythia8 consistently reproduce the experimental results for all charged particles, underlying events, intrajet, and leading charged particles. For charged jet rates with $p_{T}^{ch.jet} > 5$ GeV/c, EPOS4$_{Hydro}$ and Pythia8 perform exceptionally well. In the case of charged jet rates with $p_{T}^{ch.jet} > 30$ GeV/c, EPOSLHC reproduces satisfactorily good results, while EPOS4$_{Hydro}$ exhibits good agreement with the data at higher charged particle multiplicities as compared to the other models. This can be attributed to the conversion of energy into flow when "Hydro=on," leading to an increase in multiplicity. EPOSLHC model described the data well due to the new collective flow effects, correlated flow treatment, and parametrization as compared to the EPOS1.99. However, the examination of the jet $p_{T}$ spectrum and normalized charged $p_{T}$ density reveals that EPOS4$_{Hydro}$, EPOS4$_{noHydro}$, and EPOSLHC exhibit good agreement with the experimental results, while Pythia8 and EPOS1.99 do not perform as well due to the lack of correlated flow treatment.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Photon-calibrated event-activity bias and subcollision geometry in d+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV with PYTHIA 8 Angantyr

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    In PYTHIA 8 Angantyr, photon- and pion-tagged events in d+Au at 200 GeV are under-represented in the most-active centrality class and over-represented in the peripheral class relative to an Ncoll-weighted minimum-bias...