Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Accuracy on the wrong line: On the pitfalls of noisy data for out-of-distribution generalisation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.19049 v1 pith:SZLZFQUW submitted 2024-06-27 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords datafeaturesnuisancephenomenonaccuracynoisyout-of-distributionaccuracy-on-the-line
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

"Accuracy-on-the-line" is a widely observed phenomenon in machine learning, where a model's accuracy on in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) data is positively correlated across different hyperparameters and data configurations. But when does this useful relationship break down? In this work, we explore its robustness. The key observation is that noisy data and the presence of nuisance features can be sufficient to shatter the Accuracy-on-the-line phenomenon. In these cases, ID and OOD accuracy can become negatively correlated, leading to "Accuracy-on-the-wrong-line". This phenomenon can also occur in the presence of spurious (shortcut) features, which tend to overshadow the more complex signal (core, non-spurious) features, resulting in a large nuisance feature space. Moreover, scaling to larger datasets does not mitigate this undesirable behavior and may even exacerbate it. We formally prove a lower bound on Out-of-distribution (OOD) error in a linear classification model, characterizing the conditions on the noise and nuisance features for a large OOD error. We finally demonstrate this phenomenon across both synthetic and real datasets with noisy data and nuisance features.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Consensus-Driven Active Model Selection

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    CODA uses consensus-based priors and Bayesian updating to select the best candidate model with far fewer labels than prior active model selection methods, beating them on 18 of 26 benchmark tasks.

  2. Measuring Time-Series Dataset Similarity using Wasserstein Distance

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Time-series dataset similarity is defined via the Wasserstein distance between fitted multivariate normal distributions, and the distance shows partial correlation with foundation model inference loss.

Pith tools