Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Specialized curricula for training vision-language models in retinal image analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.08410 v2 pith:WHWJGQST submitted 2024-07-11 cs.AI

Specialized curricula for training vision-language models in retinal image analysis

classification cs.AI
keywords medicalvlmsclinicalchatgpt-4ofoundationmodelsophthalmologistspatient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Clinicians spend a significant amount of time reviewing medical images and transcribing their findings regarding patient diagnosis, referral and treatment in text form. Vision-language models (VLMs), which automatically interpret images and summarize their findings as text, have enormous potential to alleviate clinical workloads and increase patient access to high-quality medical care. While foundational models have stirred considerable interest in the medical community, it is unclear whether their general capabilities translate to real-world clinical utility. In this work, we demonstrate that OpenAI's ChatGPT-4o model, in addition to two foundation VLMs designed for medical use, markedly underperform compared to practicing ophthalmologists on specialist tasks crucial to the care of patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). To address this, we initially identified the essential capabilities required for image-based clinical decision-making, and then developed a curriculum to selectively train VLMs in these skills. The resulting model, RetinaVLM, can be instructed to write reports that significantly outperform those written by leading foundation medical VLMs and ChatGPT-4o in disease staging (F1 score of 0.63 vs. 0.33) and patient referral (0.67 vs. 0.50), and approaches the diagnostic performance of junior ophthalmologists (who achieve 0.77 and 0.78 on the respective tasks). Furthermore, in a single-blind reader study two senior ophthalmologists with up to 32 years of experience found RetinaVLM's reports were found to be substantially more accurate than those by ChatGPT-4o (64.3% vs. 14.3%). These results reinforce that our curriculum-based approach provides a blueprint towards specializing foundation medical VLMs for real-world clinical tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. RetiBridge: Bridging Quantitative Retinal Biomarkers and Qualitative Diagnosis with a Knowledge-Guided Multimodal Large Language Model

    cs.AI 2025-10 reject novelty 6.0

    RetiBridge/GROK is a 7B multimodal LLM trained to turn quantitative retinal biomarkers into qualitative diagnoses, outperforming larger open models and OpenAI-o3 on its self-built, LLM-judged benchmark.