REVIEW 1 cited by
Accounting for plasticity: An extension of inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Accounting for plasticity: An extension of inelastic Constitutive Artificial Neural Networks
read the original abstract
In this work, we extend the existing framework of inelastic constitutive artificial neural networks (iCANNs) by incorporating plasticity to increase their applicability to model more complex material behavior. The proposed approach ensures objectivity, material symmetry, and thermodynamic consistency, providing a robust basis for automatic model discovery of constitutive equations at finite strains. These are predicted by discovering formulations for the Helmholtz free energy and plastic potentials for the yield function and evolution equations in terms of feed-forward networks. Our framework captures both linear and nonlinear kinematic hardening behavior. Investigation of our model's prediction showed that the extended iCANNs successfully predict both linear and nonlinear kinematic hardening behavior based on experimental and artificially generated datasets, showcasing promising capabilities of this framework. Nonetheless, challenges remain in discovering more complex yield criteria with tension-compression asymmetry and addressing deviations in experimental data at larger strains. Despite these limitations, the proposed framework provides a promising basis for incorporating plasticity into iCANNs, offering a platform for advancing in the field of automated model discovery.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A hierarchy of thermodynamics learning frameworks for inelastic constitutive modeling
With identical neural building blocks, dissipation-potential, GSM, and metriplectic models all learn accurate inelastic stress responses; performance differences are modest and dataset-dependent.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.