REVIEW 4 cited by
Stabilizer bootstrapping: A recipe for efficient agnostic tomography and magic estimation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We study the task of agnostic tomography: given copies of an unknown $n$-qubit state $\rho$ which has fidelity $\tau$ with some state in a given class $C$, find a state which has fidelity $\ge \tau - \epsilon$ with $\rho$. We give a new framework, stabilizer bootstrapping, for designing computationally efficient protocols for this task, and use this to get new agnostic tomography protocols for the following classes: Stabilizer states: We give a protocol that runs in time $\mathrm{poly}(n,1/\epsilon)\cdot (1/\tau)^{O(\log(1/\tau))}$, answering an open question posed by Grewal, Iyer, Kretschmer, Liang [43] and Anshu and Arunachalam [6]. Previous protocols ran in time $\mathrm{exp}(\Theta(n))$ or required $\tau>\cos^2(\pi/8)$. States with stabilizer dimension $n - t$: We give a protocol that runs in time $n^3\cdot(2^t/\tau)^{O(\log(1/\epsilon))}$, extending recent work on learning quantum states prepared by circuits with few non-Clifford gates, which only applied in the realizable setting where $\tau = 1$ [33, 40, 49, 66]. Discrete product states: If $C = K^{\otimes n}$ for some $\mu$-separated discrete set $K$ of single-qubit states, we give a protocol that runs in time $(n/\mu)^{O((1 + \log (1/\tau))/\mu)}/\epsilon^2$. This strictly generalizes a prior guarantee which applied to stabilizer product states [42]. For stabilizer product states, we give a further improved protocol that runs in time $(n^2/\epsilon^2)\cdot (1/\tau)^{O(\log(1/\tau))}$. As a corollary, we give the first protocol for estimating stabilizer fidelity, a standard measure of magic for quantum states, to error $\epsilon$ in $n^3 \mathrm{quasipoly}(1/\epsilon)$ time.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Information-Computation Gaps in Quantum Learning via Low-Degree Likelihood
A quantum extension of the low-degree method shows that state designs imply computational hardness for many single-copy quantum measurement strategies, yielding new information-computation gaps.
-
A near-optimal Quadratic Goldreich-Levin algorithm
A quadratic Goldreich-Levin algorithm finds a quadratic phase with correlation within epsilon of optimal for any bounded Boolean function, using O_epsilon(n^2 log n) queries and O(n^3) time.
-
Adaptive Quantum Computers: decoding and state preparation
Adaptive quantum computers, mixing quantum circuits with classical parity processing, provably separate from classical shallow circuits on Hadamard list decoding and also prepare standard quantum states more efficiently.
-
The Stabilizer Bootstrap of Quantum Machine Learning with up to 10000 qubits
For Clifford angle assignments in single-layer variational circuits, the probability of a nonzero Pauli expectation value is exactly 1/4 in some observable/wiring combinations and decays like 1/2^{n/2} in others, with...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.