Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enhancing Depression Diagnosis with Chain-of-Thought Prompting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.14053 v2 pith:F2VA7SAN submitted 2024-08-26 cs.CL

Enhancing Depression Diagnosis with Chain-of-Thought Prompting

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsscoreswhenchain-of-thoughtdisorderpatientphq-8prompting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

When using AI to detect signs of depressive disorder, AI models habitually draw preemptive conclusions. We theorize that using chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to evaluate Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) scores will improve the accuracy of the scores determined by AI models. In our findings, when the models reasoned with CoT, the estimated PHQ-8 scores were consistently closer on average to the accepted true scores reported by each participant compared to when not using CoT. Our goal is to expand upon AI models' understanding of the intricacies of human conversation, allowing them to more effectively assess a patient's feelings and tone, therefore being able to more accurately discern mental disorder symptoms; ultimately, we hope to augment AI models' abilities, so that they can be widely accessible and used in the medical field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Mental Health Disorder Detection Beyond Social Media: A Systematic Review of Available Datasets

    cs.CL 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5

    The first PRISMA review of non-social-media free-text mental-health datasets shows English/depression dominance and large gaps in diversity, labeling standards, and public clinical data.