REVIEW 1 cited by
Hammering at the entropy: A GENERIC-guided approach to learning polymeric rheological constitutive equations using PINNs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Hammering at the entropy: A GENERIC-guided approach to learning polymeric rheological constitutive equations using PINNs
read the original abstract
We present a versatile framework that employs Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to discover the entropic contribution that leads to the constitutive equation for the extra-stress in rheological models of polymer solutions. In this framework the training of the Neural Network is guided by an evolution equation for the conformation tensor which is GENERIC-compliant. We compare two training methodologies for the data-driven PINN constitutive models: one trained on data from the analytical solution of the Oldroyd-B model under steady-state rheometric flows (PINN-rheometric), and another trained on in-silico data generated from complex flow CFD simulations around a cylinder that use the Oldroyd-B model (PINN-complex). The capacity of the PINN models to provide good predictions are evaluated by comparison with CFD simulations using the underlying Oldroyd-B model as a reference. Both models are capable of predicting flow behavior in transient and complex conditions; however, the PINN-complex model, trained on a broader range of mixed flow data, outperforms the PINN-rheometric model in complex flow scenarios. The geometry agnostic character of our methodology allows us to apply the learned PINN models to flows with different topologies than the ones used for training.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A hierarchy of thermodynamics learning frameworks for inelastic constitutive modeling
With identical neural building blocks, dissipation-potential, GSM, and metriplectic models all learn accurate inelastic stress responses; performance differences are modest and dataset-dependent.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.