Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

SwiftDossier: Tailored Automatic Dossier for Drug Discovery with LLMs and Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.15817 v1 pith:SNEAKECA submitted 2024-09-24 cs.AI

SwiftDossier: Tailored Automatic Dossier for Drug Discovery with LLMs and Agents

classification cs.AI
keywords llmsanswersdossierartificialautomaticdiscoverydrugexternal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advancement of artificial intelligence algorithms has expanded their application to several fields such as the biomedical domain. Artificial intelligence systems, including Large Language Models (LLMs), can be particularly advantageous in drug discovery, which is a very long and expensive process. However, LLMs by themselves lack in-depth knowledge about specific domains and can generate factually incorrect information. Moreover, they are not able to perform more complex actions that imply the usage of external tools. Our work is focused on these two issues. Firstly, we show how the implementation of an advanced RAG system can help the LLM to generate more accurate answers to drug-discovery-related questions. The results show that the answers generated by the LLM with the RAG system surpass in quality the answers produced by the model without RAG. Secondly, we show how to create an automatic target dossier using LLMs and incorporating them with external tools that they can use to execute more intricate tasks to gather data such as accessing databases and executing code. The result is a production-ready target dossier containing the acquired information summarized into a PDF and a PowerPoint presentation.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Evaluating Agentic Bioinformatics through Function, Evidence, and Validation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0

    Agentic bioinformatics systems mostly demonstrate planning and tool execution but rarely prospective empirical validation, so the paper argues evaluation should center on inspectable workflow trajectories (FEV) rather...

  2. From Text to Discovery: How Large Language Models Are Reshaping Research Across Scientific and Humanistic Disciplines

    cs.DL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    LLMs accelerate research workflows from idea generation to writing but introduce challenges like hallucination, bias, opacity, and ten systemic risks requiring new governance frameworks.

  3. From Text to Discovery: How Large Language Models Are Reshaping Research Across Scientific and Humanistic Disciplines

    cs.DL 2026-06 conditional novelty 3.0

    A cross-disciplinary review of 151 studies concludes LLMs accelerate research workflows while introducing recurring technical and ethical risks, including ten it flags as underexplored.