pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.13844 · v3 · submitted 2024-10-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Post-measurement Quantum Monte Carlo

Kriti Baweja , David J. Luitz , Samuel J. Garratt This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords quantum Monte Carlostochastic series expansionpost-measurement statesmeasurement-induced phenomenaHeisenberg antiferromagnetsign problemthermal density matrixloop updates
0
0 comments X

The pith

A post-measurement stochastic series expansion samples operator strings in measured density matrices to compute correlations after many local observations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a generalized stochastic series expansion for density matrices produced by repeated measurements on quantum ground and thermal states. By expanding these matrices as sums over operator strings and using importance sampling, the algorithm studies the Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice under SU(2)-symmetric measurements. It identifies classes of states where deterministic loop updates remain efficient and sign-problem free, demonstrating creation of long-range Bell pairs, symmetry-protected topological order, and enhanced antiferromagnetic correlations. The approach also covers measurement bases that keep all post-measurement states sign-free. A reader would care because the method supplies a scalable numerical route to collective effects induced by large numbers of measurements.

Core claim

We show that effects of large numbers of measurements on many-body quantum states can be studied with Quantum Monte Carlo by expanding measured thermal density matrices as sums over operator strings. Our post-measurement SSE performs importance sampling of these strings. For the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet, SU(2)-symmetric measurements on identifiable classes of post-measurement states permit deterministic loop updates and sign-problem-free computation in a site-local basis, revealing long-range Bell pairs, symmetry-protected topological order, and measurement-enhanced antiferromagnetic correlations. When measurements preserve the sign-free property of the unmeasured SSE, all post-me

What carries the argument

Post-measurement stochastic series expansion (SSE) that importance-samples operator strings contributing to a measured thermal density matrix and supports deterministic loop updates when SU(2) symmetry is preserved.

If this is right

  • Measurements can generate long-range Bell pairs between distant sites.
  • Measurements can induce symmetry-protected topological order.
  • Measurements can enhance antiferromagnetic correlations beyond the unmeasured thermal state.
  • Certain measurement schemes keep the entire post-measurement ensemble sign-free.
  • The method scales to large numbers of measurements on two-dimensional lattices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sampling strategy could be adapted to other sign-free QMC models such as the XXZ chain or dimer models.
  • Numerical estimates from this method could guide which measurement protocols to prioritize in quantum simulators.
  • The approach opens a route to studying how measurement rate controls the crossover from thermal to post-measurement phases.
  • Extension to open-system dynamics would require adding continuous monitoring operators to the string expansion.

Load-bearing premise

There exist identifiable classes of post-measurement states for which SU(2)-symmetric measurements permit efficient deterministic loop updates and sign-problem-free computation in a site-local basis.

What would settle it

A post-measurement state of the square-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet in which SU(2)-symmetric measurements produce a sign problem in every site-local basis or prevent efficient loop updates from converging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.13844 by David J. Luitz, Kriti Baweja, Samuel J. Garratt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Operator string in the post-measurement stochas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. AFM Heisenberg model on a square lattice. Interac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Example post-measurement SSE configuration for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Allowed vertices in the measurement string for (up [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Benchmarking post-measurement SSE against ED for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Post-measurement states of the 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Total spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Correlations between unmeasured spins following [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Left: given a pair of singlets on vertical bonds (red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. String order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Post-measurement spin correlations in the isotropic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Correlations at fixed distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Post-measurement spin correlations in the quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Freezing loop update for single-body [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Figure illustrating single site [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Connected spin correlations along the principal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Example SSE configuration within the inhomoge [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Spin correlations along the vertical of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_19.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show how the effects of large numbers of measurements on many-body quantum ground and thermal states can be studied using Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC). Density matrices generated by measurement in this setting feature products of many local non-unitary operators, and by expanding these density matrices as sums over operator strings we arrive at a generalized stochastic series expansion (SSE). Our `post-measurement SSE' is based on importance sampling of operator strings contributing to a measured thermal density matrix. We demonstrate our algorithm by probing the effects of measurements on the spin-$1/2$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice. Thermal states of this system have \SU{2} symmetry, and at first we preserve this symmetry by measuring \SU{2} symmetric observables. We identify classes of post-measurement states for which correlations can be calculated efficiently, as well as states for which \SU{2} symmetric measurements generate a QMC sign problem when working in any site-local basis. For the first class, we show how deterministic loop updates can be leveraged. Using our algorithm we demonstrate the creation of long-range Bell pairs and symmetry-protected topological order, as well as the measurement-induced enhancement of antiferromagnetic correlations. We then study the effects of measuring the system in a basis where the standard (unmeasured) SSE is sign-free: for measurement schemes with this property, we can calculate correlations in all post-measurement states without a sign problem. The method developed in this work opens the door to scalable experimental probes of measurement-induced collective phenomena, which require numerical estimates for the effects of measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a 'post-measurement SSE' extension of the stochastic series expansion Quantum Monte Carlo method to simulate the effects of many local measurements on quantum ground and thermal states. Measured density matrices are expanded as sums over operator strings, which are then importance-sampled. Applied to the SU(2)-symmetric spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the square lattice, the work identifies two classes of post-measurement states: one permitting deterministic loop updates and sign-problem-free sampling in a site-local basis under SU(2)-symmetric measurements, and another that introduces a sign problem. For measurement schemes that preserve sign-freeness of the underlying SSE, correlations remain computable without a sign problem in all post-measurement states. Numerical demonstrations include measurement-induced long-range Bell pairs, symmetry-protected topological order, and enhanced antiferromagnetic correlations.

Significance. If the algorithmic claims hold, the work supplies a practical, scalable QMC route to numerically benchmark measurement-induced phenomena that are currently of high experimental interest. Credit is due for the explicit separation of sign-free versus sign-problematic classes, the reuse of deterministic loop updates where possible, and the concrete demonstration that certain measurement bases remain sign-free. These features directly address the computational bottleneck of products of many non-unitary operators and provide falsifiable predictions for future experiments.

minor comments (2)
  1. The description of the two classes of post-measurement states (SU(2)-symmetric measurements that remain sign-free versus those that generate a sign problem) would benefit from an explicit table or flowchart early in the manuscript that lists the measurement operators, the resulting sign behavior, and the applicable update scheme for each class.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the number of measurements performed and the inverse temperature or ground-state projector used, to allow direct comparison with the analytic limits discussed in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures the scope and results of the post-measurement SSE method applied to the Heisenberg antiferromagnet. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper introduces a post-measurement generalization of the stochastic series expansion (SSE) by expanding measured thermal density matrices as sums over operator strings and developing importance sampling with deterministic loop updates for SU(2)-symmetric cases on the Heisenberg antiferromagnet. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the sign-free property for certain measurement classes is presented as a direct consequence of the symmetry preservation in the chosen basis, without renaming or smuggling prior results. The derivation is self-contained as an algorithmic construction with explicit separation of sign-problem-free and sign-problem classes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the method is presented as a direct generalization of standard SSE without additional postulated objects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5822 in / 1123 out tokens · 33901 ms · 2026-05-23T19:10:58.073537+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Learning transitions in classical Ising models and deformed toric codes

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Learning transitions exist in the 2D Ising model when inferring local energies via Bayesian methods, intersecting the thermal transition at a new tricritical point and implying robustness of quantum memory in deformed...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Such updates satisfy detailed balance and are designed to always give allowed operator strings

    operators have weights of the same magnitude, it be- comes possible to use highly efficient loop updates [55] of the entire P0 b HaP0 c operator string. Such updates satisfy detailed balance and are designed to always give allowed operator strings. FIG. 5. Post-measurement states of the 2 × 6 spin ladder used for benchmarking in Fig. 6. Solid black lines ...

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    H. J. Briegel, D. E. Browne, W. D¨ ur, R. Raussendorf, and M. Van den Nest, Measurement-based quantum compu- tation, Nat. Phys. 5, 19–26 (2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Arute, K

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, and et al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, Nature 574, 505–510 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    J. C. Napp, R. L. La Placa, A. M. Dalzell, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, and A. W. Harrow, Efficient Classical Simu- lation of Random Shallow 2D Quantum Circuits, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021021 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Skinner, J

    B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement- Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entangle- ment, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Y. Li, X. Chen, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum Zeno effect and the many-body entanglement transition, Phys. Rev. B 98, 205136 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    M. P. Fisher, V. Khemani, A. Nahum, and S. Vijay, Ran- dom Quantum Circuits, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 335–379 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Raussendorf, S

    R. Raussendorf, S. Bravyi, and J. Harrington, Long- range quantum entanglement in noisy cluster states, Phys. Rev. A 71, 062313 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    Aguado, G

    M. Aguado, G. K. Brennen, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Creation, Manipulation, and Detection of Abelian and Non-Abelian Anyons in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 260501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  10. [10]

    Piroli, G

    L. Piroli, G. Styliaris, and J. I. Cirac, Quantum Circuits Assisted by Local Operations and Classical Communica- tion: Transformations and Phases of Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 220503 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Tantivasadakarn, R

    N. Tantivasadakarn, R. Thorngren, A. Vishwanath, and R. Verresen, Long-Range Entanglement from Measuring Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021040 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    T.-C. Lu, L. A. Lessa, I. H. Kim, and T. H. Hsieh, Mea- surement as a Shortcut to Long-Range Entangled Quan- tum Matter, PRX Quantum 3, 040337 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    G.-Y. Zhu, N. Tantivasadakarn, A. Vishwanath, S. Trebst, and R. Verresen, Nishimori’s Cat: Stable Long-Range Entanglement from Finite-Depth Unitaries and Weak Measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 200201 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    J. Y. Lee, W. Ji, Z. Bi, and M. P. A. Fisher, Decod- ing Measurement-Prepared Quantum Phases and Tran- sitions: from Ising model to gauge theory, and beyond, arXiv:2208.11699 [cond-mat.str-el] (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Polynomial-time classical sampling of high-temperature quantum Gibbs states

    C. Yin and A. Lucas, Polynomial-time classical sam- pling of high-temperature quantum Gibbs states, arXiv:2305.18514 [quant-ph] (2023). 22

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Bakshi, A

    A. Bakshi, A. Liu, A. Moitra, and E. Tang, High- Temperature Gibbs States are Unentangled and Effi- ciently Preparable, arXiv:2403.16850 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    S. J. Garratt, Z. Weinstein, and E. Altman, Measure- ments Conspire Nonlocally to Restructure Critical Quan- tum States, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021026 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    J. Y. Lee, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Quantum Criticality Under Decoherence or Weak Measurement, PRX Quan- tum 4, 030317 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Murciano, P

    S. Murciano, P. Sala, Y. Liu, R. S. K. Mong, and J. Al- icea, Measurement-Altered Ising Quantum Criticality, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041042 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Weinstein, R

    Z. Weinstein, R. Sajith, E. Altman, and S. J. Garratt, Nonlocality and entanglement in measured critical quan- tum Ising chains, Phys. Rev. B 107, 245132 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Z. Yang, D. Mao, and C.-M. Jian, Entanglement in a one-dimensional critical state after measurements, Phys. Rev. B 108, 165120 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    X. Sun, H. Yao, and S.-K. Jian, New critical states induced by measurement, arXiv:2301.11337 [quant-ph] (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    K. Su, N. Myerson-Jain, C. Wang, C.-M. Jian, and C. Xu, Higher-Form Symmetries under Weak Measure- ment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 200402 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    P. Sala, S. Murciano, Y. Liu, and J. Alicea, Quantum Criticality Under Imperfect Teleportation, PRX Quan- tum 5, 030307 (2024)

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Hoshino, M

    M. Hoshino, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Ashida, Entan- glement swapping in critical quantum spin chains, arXiv:2406.12377 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    R. A. Patil and A. W. W. Ludwig, Highly complex novel critical behavior from the intrinsic randomness of quantum mechanical measurements on critical ground states – a controlled renormalization group analysis, arXiv:2409.02107 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    M. A. Rajabpour, Post-measurement bipartite entangle- ment entropy in conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. B 92, 075108 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    A. W. Sandvik, Computational Studies of Quantum Spin Systems, AIP Conf. Proc. 1297, 135 (2010)

    work page 2010

  29. [29]

    C.-J. Lin, W. Ye, Y. Zou, S. Sang, and T. H. Hsieh, Probing sign structure using measurement-induced en- tanglement, Quantum 7, 910 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Cheng, R

    Z. Cheng, R. Wen, S. Gopalakrishnan, R. Vasseur, and A. C. Potter, Universal structure of measurement- induced information in many-body ground states, Phys. Rev. B 109, 195128 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    M. J. Gullans and D. A. Huse, Scalable Probes of Measurement-Induced Criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 070606 (2020)

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Li and M

    Y. Li and M. P. A. Fisher, Decodable hybrid dynamics of open quantum systems with Z2 symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    C. Noel, P. Niroula, D. Zhu, A. Risinger, L. Egan, D. Biswas, M. Cetina, A. V. Gorshkov, M. J. Gullans, D. A. Huse, and C. Monroe, Measurement-induced quan- tum phases realized in a trapped-ion quantum computer, Nat. Phys. 18, 760–764 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Y. Li, Y. Zou, P. Glorioso, E. Altman, and M. P. A. Fisher, Cross Entropy Benchmark for Measurement- Induced Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 220404 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    J. C. Hoke, M. Ippoliti, E. Rosenberg, D. Abanin, R. Acharya, Andersen, and et al., Measurement-induced entanglement and teleportation on a noisy quantum pro- cessor, Nature 622, 481–486 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    S. J. Garratt and E. Altman, Probing Postmeasurement Entanglement without Postselection, PRX Quantum 5, 030311 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    McGinley, Postselection-Free Learning of Measurement-Induced Quantum Dynamics, PRX Quantum 5, 020347 (2024)

    M. McGinley, Postselection-Free Learning of Measurement-Induced Quantum Dynamics, PRX Quantum 5, 020347 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Tikhanovskaya, A

    M. Tikhanovskaya, A. Lavasani, M. P. A. Fisher, and S. Vijay, Universality of the cross-entropy in Z2 sym- metric monitored quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. B 109, 224313 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Kamakari, J

    H. Kamakari, J. Sun, Y. Li, J. J. Thio, T. P. Gu- jarati, M. P. A. Fisher, M. Motta, and A. J. Min- nich, Experimental demonstration of scalable cross- entropy benchmarking to detect measurement-induced phase transitions on a superconducting quantum proces- sor, arXiv:2403.00938 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys. 16, 132–142 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Kjaergaard, M

    M. Kjaergaard, M. E. Schwartz, J. Braum¨ uller, P. Krantz, J. I.-J. Wang, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 369–395 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Minev, S

    Z. Minev, S. Mundhada, S. Shankar, P. Reinhold, R. Guti´ errez-J´ auregui, R. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, H. Carmichael, and M. Devoret, To catch and reverse a quantum jump mid-flight, Nature 570, 200–204 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Iqbal, N

    M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, T. M. Gatterman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, and et al., Topological order from measurements and feed-forward on a trapped ion quan- tum computer, Nat. Commun. Phys. 7, 205 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, and et al., Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 58–65 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Chakravarty, B

    S. Chakravarty, B. I. Halperin, and D. R. Nelson, Two- dimensional quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B 39, 2344 (1989)

    work page 1989

  49. [49]

    Senthil, Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases of Quantum Matter, Annu

    T. Senthil, Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases of Quantum Matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 299–324 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    M. A. Metlitski, Boundary criticality of the O(N) model in d = 3 critically revisited, SciPost Phys.12, 131 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Auerbach, Interacting electrons and quantum mag- netism (Springer, New York, 2012)

    A. Auerbach, Interacting electrons and quantum mag- netism (Springer, New York, 2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    Wenzel and W

    S. Wenzel and W. Janke, Comprehensive quantum Monte Carlo study of the quantum critical points in planar dimerized/quadrumerized Heisenberg models, Phys. Rev. B 79, 014410 (2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    A. W. Sandvik, Stochastic series expansion method with operator-loop update, Phys. Rev. B 59, R14157 (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    Y.-Z. You, Z. Bi, A. Rasmussen, K. Slagle, and C. Xu, Wave Function and Strange Correlator of Short-Range Entangled States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 247202 (2014). 23

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    Wu, Y.-Y

    H.-Q. Wu, Y.-Y. He, Y.-Z. You, C. Xu, Z. Y. Meng, and Z.-Y. Lu, Quantum Monte Carlo study of strange corre- lator in interacting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 92, 165123 (2015)

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    O. F. Sylju˚ asen and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum Monte Carlo with directed loops, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046701 (2002)

    work page 2002

  57. [57]

    R. R. P. Singh and D. A. Huse, Microscopic calculation of the spin-stiffness constant for the spin-1/2 square- lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 40, 7247 (1989)

    work page 1989

  58. [58]

    Bachmann, W

    S. Bachmann, W. De Roeck, and M. Fraas, Adiabatic Theorem for Quantum Spin Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 060201 (2017)

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Z. Jia, W. Huie, L. Li, W. K. C. Sun, X. Hu, Aakash, H. Kogan, A. Karve, J. Y. Lee, and J. P. Covey, An architecture for two-qubit encoding in neutral ytterbium- 171 atoms, arXiv:2402.13134 [quant-ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Ver- straete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 045003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topo- logical order, Phys. Rev. B 80, 155131 (2009)

    work page 2009

  62. [62]

    Pollmann, A

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Oshikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one di- mension, Phys. Rev. B 81, 064439 (2010)

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    Vidal and R

    G. Vidal and R. F. Werner, Computable measure of en- tanglement, Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002)

    work page 2002

  64. [64]

    Devetak and A

    I. Devetak and A. Winter, Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states, Proc. R. Soc. A 461, 207–235 (2005)

    work page 2005

  65. [65]

    Krishnan and M

    A. Krishnan and M. A. Metlitski, A plane defect in the 3d O(N) model, SciPost Phys. 15, 090 (2023)

    work page 2023

  66. [66]

    Y. Sun, M. Hu, Y. Deng, and J.-P. Lv, Extraordinary- log Universality of Critical Phenomena in Plane Defects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 207101 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    R. G. Melko, A. B. Kallin, and M. B. Hastings, Finite- size scaling of mutual information in Monte Carlo simu- lations: Application to the spin-1 /2 XXZ model, Phys. Rev. B 82, 100409 (2010)

    work page 2010

  68. [68]

    M. B. Hastings, I. Gonz´ alez, A. B. Kallin, and R. G. Melko, Measuring Renyi Entanglement Entropy in Quan- tum Monte Carlo Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 157201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  69. [69]

    Humeniuk and T

    S. Humeniuk and T. Roscilde, Quantum Monte Carlo calculation of entanglement R´ enyi entropies for generic quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 86, 235116 (2012)

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Baweja, D

    K. Baweja, D. Luitz, and S. Garratt, Data and code to generate plots for post-measurement quantum monte carlo (2024), data set

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    D. J. Luitz, X. Plat, N. Laflorencie, and F. Alet, Im- proving entanglement and thermodynamic R´ enyi entropy measurements in quantum Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. B 90, 125105 (2014)

    work page 2014