Self-Supervised Learning and Opportunistic Inference for Continuous Monitoring of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

Daniel Peterson; Hassan Ghasemzadeh; Shovito Barua Soumma; Shyamal Mehta

arxiv: 2410.21326 · v2 · submitted 2024-10-27 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Self-Supervised Learning and Opportunistic Inference for Continuous Monitoring of Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease

Shovito Barua Soumma , Daniel Peterson , Shyamal Mehta , Hassan Ghasemzadeh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 19:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI

keywords self-supervised learningfreezing of gaitParkinson's diseaseopportunistic inferencewearable sensorsin-home monitoringlimited labeled data

0 comments

The pith

LIFT-PD detects freezing of gait using self-supervised pre-training on unlabeled data plus a differential hopping window, cutting labeled data needs to 40 percent while raising precision 7.25 percent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces LIFT-PD as a framework that pre-trains on unlabeled sensor data, then applies a differential hopping window to extract features from sparse labeled examples for real-time freezing-of-gait detection. An added opportunistic activation module turns the model on only during movement periods. Experiments report higher precision and accuracy than fully supervised baselines despite using far less labeled data, plus substantially lower inference time. The work targets practical in-home monitoring that avoids the power and labeling barriers of existing systems.

Core claim

LIFT-PD achieves a 7.25 percent precision gain and 4.4 percent accuracy gain over supervised models while requiring only 40 percent of the labeled training data, and its model activation module reduces inference time by up to 67 percent by activating computation only during active periods.

What carries the argument

Differential hopping windowing technique combined with self-supervised pre-training on unlabeled data, plus an opportunistic model activation module that selectively runs the deep network.

If this is right

FoG monitoring systems can be deployed in homes with far smaller annotation budgets than current supervised approaches require.
Battery life on wearable sensors improves because inference runs only during detected active periods rather than continuously.
The same pre-training plus hopping-window pipeline can be applied to other episodic motor symptoms that produce sparse labeled events.
Real-time alerts become feasible without constant high-power computation on edge devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the activation module generalizes, similar selective-inference tricks could extend battery life in other continuous health-monitoring wearables.
The reliance on unlabeled pre-training data raises the question of how much domain-specific unlabeled PD sensor data is actually needed before performance plateaus.
A natural next measurement would be whether the same gains hold when the model is fine-tuned on data from a single patient rather than a population pool.

Load-bearing premise

The differential hopping window plus self-supervised pre-training on unlabeled data will still produce useful features when only 40 percent of the usual labeled examples are available.

What would settle it

A controlled test on an independent PD cohort that applies the same 40 percent labeling budget and shows no precision or accuracy advantage over a supervised baseline trained on the full set.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2410.21326 by Daniel Peterson, Hassan Ghasemzadeh, Shovito Barua Soumma, Shyamal Mehta.

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: As observed in Table IX, lowering the activity threshold [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurological disorder that impacts the quality of life significantly, making in-home monitoring of motor symptoms such as Freezing of Gait (FoG) critical. However, existing symptom monitoring technologies are power-hungry, rely on extensive amounts of labeled data, and operate in controlled settings. These shortcomings limit real-world deployment of the technology. This work presents LIFT-PD, a computationally-efficient self-supervised learning framework for real-time FoG detection. Our method combines self-supervised pre-training on unlabeled data with a novel differential hopping windowing technique to learn from limited labeled instances. An opportunistic model activation module further minimizes power consumption by selectively activating the deep learning module only during active periods. Extensive experimental results show that LIFT-PD achieves a 7.25% increase in precision and 4.4% improvement in accuracy compared to supervised models while using as low as 40% of the labeled training data used for supervised learning. Additionally, the model activation module reduces inference time by up to 67% compared to continuous inference. LIFT-PD paves the way for practical, energy-efficient, and unobtrusive in-home monitoring of PD patients with minimal labeling requirements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

LIFT-PD presents a practical self-supervised approach to FoG monitoring that reduces labeling and power demands, with gains that look worth verifying in the full experiments.

read the letter

LIFT-PD is a self-supervised learning framework for continuous monitoring of freezing of gait that incorporates differential hopping windowing and an opportunistic activation module. The main results show it outperforming supervised models in precision and accuracy while requiring substantially less labeled data, and it cuts inference time by activating the model selectively. The paper does well in highlighting the limitations of existing technologies for in-home use. Current systems are often power-hungry and demand extensive labeled datasets, which hinders their practical application in daily life for Parkinson's patients. By leveraging unlabeled data for pre-training and only running inference when necessary, the approach aims to overcome these issues. The opportunistic activation is particularly sensible for reducing power consumption in battery-powered devices. It avoids unnecessary computation during periods without relevant activity, which is common in continuous monitoring scenarios. The differential hopping windowing technique is the part that stands out as potentially new, allowing the model to adapt window sizes based on signal differences rather than using fixed intervals. Soft spots include the need for more transparent experimental details. While the abstract provides specific percentage improvements, the full paper should include information on the number of subjects, sensor types, and how the 40% labeled data was selected to allow proper assessment of the claims. The gains are not huge, so they need to be shown as reliable rather than tied to particular experimental conditions. This paper is for researchers working on machine learning applications in healthcare, especially those dealing with wearable sensors for movement disorders. It could also appeal to engineers focused on optimizing inference for low-power devices. I would recommend it goes to peer review. The work has a clear motivation and a testable set of ideas that fit within the scope of applied ML papers.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents LIFT-PD, a self-supervised learning framework for real-time Freezing of Gait (FoG) detection in Parkinson's disease. It combines self-supervised pre-training on unlabeled data, a differential hopping windowing technique for learning from limited labels, and an opportunistic model activation module to reduce power use, claiming a 7.25% precision increase and 4.4% accuracy improvement over supervised models with only 40% of the labeled data, plus up to 67% reduction in inference time.

Significance. If the empirical results hold under standard evaluation protocols, the work offers a practical path toward energy-efficient, label-efficient in-home FoG monitoring, directly addressing power consumption and labeling barriers that currently limit deployment of wearable PD monitoring systems.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: numeric performance claims are stated without any reference to the datasets, number of subjects, or evaluation protocol; a one-sentence summary of these elements would improve readability even though the full experimental section presumably supplies them.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of LIFT-PD, recognition of its potential for practical in-home monitoring, and recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in empirical ML framework

full rationale

The paper describes an empirical self-supervised ML application for FoG detection, combining pre-training on unlabeled data with differential hopping windowing and an opportunistic activation module. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text. Performance claims (precision/accuracy gains with reduced labels, inference time reduction) rest on experimental comparisons to supervised baselines, which are externally falsifiable and do not reduce to the inputs by construction. This is a standard empirical ML study with self-contained experimental validation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no information on free parameters, background axioms, or new postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5758 in / 1115 out tokens · 33308 ms · 2026-05-23T19:20:26.727584+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Hybrid Attention Model Using Feature Decomposition and Knowledge Distillation for Glucose Forecasting
cs.LG 2024-11 unverdicted novelty 3.0

GlucoNet applies feature decomposition and knowledge distillation to a transformer model to forecast blood glucose levels from irregular multimodal data, reporting accuracy gains and model compression on data from 12 ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Characterizing freezing of gait in parkin- son’s disease: models of an episodic phenomenon,

A. Nieuwboer and N. Giladi, “Characterizing freezing of gait in parkin- son’s disease: models of an episodic phenomenon,”Movement Disorders, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1509–1519, 2013

work page 2013
[2]

Freezing of gait in parkin- sonism and its potential drug treatment,

L.-L. Zhang, S. D. Canning, and X.-P. Wang, “Freezing of gait in parkin- sonism and its potential drug treatment,” Current neuropharmacology, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 302, 2016

work page 2016
[3]

One cue does not fit all: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cueing on freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease,

C. Cosentino, M. Putzolu, S. Mezzarobba, M. Cecchella, T. Innocenti, G. Bonassi, A. Botta, G. Lagravinese, L. Avanzino, and E. Pelosin, “One cue does not fit all: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cueing on freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , p. 105189, 2023

work page 2023
[4]

A review of artificial intelligence- based gait evaluation and rehabilitation in parkinson’s disease,

P. L. Jadhwani and P. Harjpal, “A review of artificial intelligence- based gait evaluation and rehabilitation in parkinson’s disease,” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 10, 2023

work page 2023
[5]

Prediction of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease using wearables and machine learning,

L. Borz `ı, I. Mazzetta, A. Zampogna, A. Suppa, G. Olmo, and F. Irrera, “Prediction of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease using wearables and machine learning,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 614, 2021

work page 2021
[6]

Deepfog: an imu-based detection of freezing of gait episodes in parkinson’s disease patients via deep learning,

T. Bikias, D. Iakovakis, S. Hadjidimitriou, V . Charisis, and L. J. Hadjileontiadis, “Deepfog: an imu-based detection of freezing of gait episodes in parkinson’s disease patients via deep learning,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI , vol. 8, p. 537384, 2021

work page 2021
[7]

Freezing of gait and fall detection in parkinson’s disease using wearable sensors: a systematic review,

A. L. S. de Lima, L. J. W. Evers, T. Hahn, L. Bataille, J. L. Hamilton, M. A. Little, Y . Okuma, B. R. Bloem, and M. J. Faber, “Freezing of gait and fall detection in parkinson’s disease using wearable sensors: a systematic review,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 264, pp. 1642 – 1654, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:3626185

work page 2017
[8]

Foggan: Generating realistic parkinson’s disease freezing of gait data using gans,

N. Peppes, P. Tsakanikas, E. Daskalakis, T. Alexakis, E. Adamopoulou, and K. Demestichas, “Foggan: Generating realistic parkinson’s disease freezing of gait data using gans,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 19, p. 8158, 2023

work page 2023
[9]

Improvement of performance in freezing of gait detection in parkinson’s disease using transformer networks and a single waist-worn triaxial accelerometer,

L. Sigcha, L. Borz `ı, I. Pav ´on, N. Costa, S. Costa, P. Arezes, J. M. L´opez, and G. De Arcas, “Improvement of performance in freezing of gait detection in parkinson’s disease using transformer networks and a single waist-worn triaxial accelerometer,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 116, p. 105482, 2022

work page 2022
[10]

Towards real-time prediction of freezing of gait in patients with parkinson’s disease: a novel deep one-class classifier,

N. Naghavi and E. Wade, “Towards real-time prediction of freezing of gait in patients with parkinson’s disease: a novel deep one-class classifier,”IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics , vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1726–1736, 2021

work page 2021
[11]

Real-time patient adaptivity for freezing of gait classification through semi-supervised neural networks,

V . Mikos, C.-H. Heng, A. Tay, N. S. Y . Chia, K. M. L. Koh, D. M. L. Tan, and W. L. Au, “Real-time patient adaptivity for freezing of gait classification through semi-supervised neural networks,” in 2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 871–876

work page 2017
[12]

Real-time detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease using multi- head convolutional neural networks and a single inertial sensor,

L. Borz `ı, L. Sigcha, D. Rodr ´ıguez-Mart´ın, and G. Olmo, “Real-time detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease using multi- head convolutional neural networks and a single inertial sensor,” Artif. Intell. Med. , vol. 135, no. C, jan 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102459

work page doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102459 2023
[13]

A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,

T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, and G. Hinton, “A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,” 2020

work page 2020
[14]

Contrastive self- supervised learning for sensor-based human activity recognition,

B. Khaertdinov, E. Ghaleb, and S. Asteriadis, “Contrastive self- supervised learning for sensor-based human activity recognition,” in 2021 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8

work page 2021
[15]

Neonatal risk modeling and prediction,

A. Mamun, C.-C. Kuo, D. W. Britt, L. D. Devoe, M. I. Evans, H. Ghasemzadeh, and J. Klein-Seetharaman, “Neonatal risk modeling and prediction,” in 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–4

work page 2023
[16]

Personalized modeling and detection of moments of cannabis use in free-living environments,

R. R. Azghan, N. C. Glodosky, R. K. Sah, C. Cuttler, R. McLaughlin, M. J. Cleveland, and H. Ghasemzadeh, “Personalized modeling and detection of moments of cannabis use in free-living environments,” in 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2023, pp. 1–4

work page 2023
[17]

Sensor data augmentation by resampling in contrastive learning for human activity recognition,

J. Wang, T. Zhu, J. Gan, L. L. Chen, H. Ning, and Y . Wan, “Sensor data augmentation by resampling in contrastive learning for human activity recognition,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 22 994–23 008, 2022

work page 2022
[18]

Self-supervised contrastive learning for medical time series: A systematic review,

Z. Liu, A. Alavi, M. Li, and X. Zhang, “Self-supervised contrastive learning for medical time series: A systematic review,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 9, p. 4221, 2023

work page 2023
[19]

Multimodal data for the detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease,

W. Zhang, Z. Yang, H. Li, D. Huang, L. Wang, Y . Wei, L. Zhang, L. Ma, H. Feng, J. Pan et al. , “Multimodal data for the detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease,” Scientific data, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022

work page 2022
[20]

High-accuracy wearable detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease based on pseudo-multimodal features,

Y . Guo, D. Huang, W. Zhang, L. Wang, Y . Li, G. Olmo, Q. Wang, F. Meng, and P. Chan, “High-accuracy wearable detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease based on pseudo-multimodal features,” Computers in Biology and Medicine , vol. 146, p. 105629, 2022

work page 2022
[21]

Parkinson’s freezing of gait prediction,

A. Howard, A. Salomon, E. Gazit, HCL-Jevster, J. Hausdorff, L. Kirsch, Maggie, P. Ginis, R. Holbrook, and Y . F. Karim, “Parkinson’s freezing of gait prediction,” Kaggle, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //kaggle.com/competitions/tlvmc-parkinsons-freezing-gait-prediction

work page 2023
[22]

Using wearable sensors and machine learning to automatically detect freezing of gait during a fog-provoking test,

T. Reches, M. Dagan, T. Herman, E. Gazit, N. A. Gouskova, N. Giladi, B. Manor, and J. M. Hausdorff, “Using wearable sensors and machine learning to automatically detect freezing of gait during a fog-provoking test,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 16, p. 4474, 2020

work page 2020
[23]

Multitarget transcranial electrical stimulation for freezing of gait: a randomized controlled trial,

B. Manor, M. Dagan, T. Herman, N. A. Gouskova, V . G. Vanderhorst, N. Giladi, T. G. Travison, A. Pascual-Leone, L. A. Lipsitz, and J. M. Hausdorff, “Multitarget transcranial electrical stimulation for freezing of gait: a randomized controlled trial,” Movement Disorders , vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2693–2698, 2021

work page 2021
[24]

A new rating instrument to assess festination and freezing gait in parkinsonian patients,

K. Ziegler, F. Schroeteler, A. O. Ceballos-Baumann, and U. M. Fietzek, “A new rating instrument to assess festination and freezing gait in parkinsonian patients,” Movement Disorders, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1012– 1018, 2010

work page 2010
[25]

Machine learning approaches to metastasis bladder and secondary pulmonary cancer classification using gene expression data,

I. R. Rahman, S. B. Soumma, and F. B. Ashraf, “Machine learning approaches to metastasis bladder and secondary pulmonary cancer classification using gene expression data,” in 2022 25th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) , 2022, pp. 430–435

work page 2022
[26]

Daphnet Freez- ing of Gait,

D. Roggen, M. Plotnik, and J. Hausdorff, “Daphnet Freez- ing of Gait,” UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C56K78

work page doi:10.24432/c56k78 2010
[27]

Mobile sensor data anonymization,

M. Malekzadeh, R. G. Clegg, A. Cavallaro, and H. Haddadi, “Mobile sensor data anonymization,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation , ser. IoTDI ’19. New York, NY , USA: ACM, 2019, pp. 49–58. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3302505.3310068

work page doi:10.1145/3302505.3310068 2019
[28]

Cueing for people with parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait: a narrative review of the state-of-the-art and novel perspectives,

P. Ginis, E. Nackaerts, A. Nieuwboer, and E. Heremans, “Cueing for people with parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait: a narrative review of the state-of-the-art and novel perspectives,” Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 407–413, 2018

work page 2018
[29]

Short-term and practice effects of metronome pacing in parkinson’s disease patients with gait freezing while in the ‘on’state: randomized single blind evaluation,

E. Cubo, S. Leurgans, and C. G. Goetz, “Short-term and practice effects of metronome pacing in parkinson’s disease patients with gait freezing while in the ‘on’state: randomized single blind evaluation,”Parkinsonism & related disorders, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 507–510, 2004

work page 2004
[30]

Cueing for freezing of gait in patients with parkinson’s disease: a rehabilitation perspective,

A. Nieuwboer, “Cueing for freezing of gait in patients with parkinson’s disease: a rehabilitation perspective,” Movement disorders: official jour- nal of the Movement Disorder Society , vol. 23, no. S2, pp. S475–S481, 2008. SHOVITOet al.: SELF-SUPERVISED LEARNING AND OPPORTUNISTIC INFERENCE FOR CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF FREEZING OF GAIT IN PARKINSON’S DISE...

work page 2008

[1] [1]

Characterizing freezing of gait in parkin- son’s disease: models of an episodic phenomenon,

A. Nieuwboer and N. Giladi, “Characterizing freezing of gait in parkin- son’s disease: models of an episodic phenomenon,”Movement Disorders, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1509–1519, 2013

work page 2013

[2] [2]

Freezing of gait in parkin- sonism and its potential drug treatment,

L.-L. Zhang, S. D. Canning, and X.-P. Wang, “Freezing of gait in parkin- sonism and its potential drug treatment,” Current neuropharmacology, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 302, 2016

work page 2016

[3] [3]

One cue does not fit all: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cueing on freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease,

C. Cosentino, M. Putzolu, S. Mezzarobba, M. Cecchella, T. Innocenti, G. Bonassi, A. Botta, G. Lagravinese, L. Avanzino, and E. Pelosin, “One cue does not fit all: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cueing on freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , p. 105189, 2023

work page 2023

[4] [4]

A review of artificial intelligence- based gait evaluation and rehabilitation in parkinson’s disease,

P. L. Jadhwani and P. Harjpal, “A review of artificial intelligence- based gait evaluation and rehabilitation in parkinson’s disease,” Cureus, vol. 15, no. 10, 2023

work page 2023

[5] [5]

Prediction of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease using wearables and machine learning,

L. Borz `ı, I. Mazzetta, A. Zampogna, A. Suppa, G. Olmo, and F. Irrera, “Prediction of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease using wearables and machine learning,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 614, 2021

work page 2021

[6] [6]

Deepfog: an imu-based detection of freezing of gait episodes in parkinson’s disease patients via deep learning,

T. Bikias, D. Iakovakis, S. Hadjidimitriou, V . Charisis, and L. J. Hadjileontiadis, “Deepfog: an imu-based detection of freezing of gait episodes in parkinson’s disease patients via deep learning,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI , vol. 8, p. 537384, 2021

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Freezing of gait and fall detection in parkinson’s disease using wearable sensors: a systematic review,

A. L. S. de Lima, L. J. W. Evers, T. Hahn, L. Bataille, J. L. Hamilton, M. A. Little, Y . Okuma, B. R. Bloem, and M. J. Faber, “Freezing of gait and fall detection in parkinson’s disease using wearable sensors: a systematic review,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 264, pp. 1642 – 1654, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:3626185

work page 2017

[8] [8]

Foggan: Generating realistic parkinson’s disease freezing of gait data using gans,

N. Peppes, P. Tsakanikas, E. Daskalakis, T. Alexakis, E. Adamopoulou, and K. Demestichas, “Foggan: Generating realistic parkinson’s disease freezing of gait data using gans,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 19, p. 8158, 2023

work page 2023

[9] [9]

Improvement of performance in freezing of gait detection in parkinson’s disease using transformer networks and a single waist-worn triaxial accelerometer,

L. Sigcha, L. Borz `ı, I. Pav ´on, N. Costa, S. Costa, P. Arezes, J. M. L´opez, and G. De Arcas, “Improvement of performance in freezing of gait detection in parkinson’s disease using transformer networks and a single waist-worn triaxial accelerometer,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 116, p. 105482, 2022

work page 2022

[10] [10]

Towards real-time prediction of freezing of gait in patients with parkinson’s disease: a novel deep one-class classifier,

N. Naghavi and E. Wade, “Towards real-time prediction of freezing of gait in patients with parkinson’s disease: a novel deep one-class classifier,”IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics , vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1726–1736, 2021

work page 2021

[11] [11]

Real-time patient adaptivity for freezing of gait classification through semi-supervised neural networks,

V . Mikos, C.-H. Heng, A. Tay, N. S. Y . Chia, K. M. L. Koh, D. M. L. Tan, and W. L. Au, “Real-time patient adaptivity for freezing of gait classification through semi-supervised neural networks,” in 2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 871–876

work page 2017

[12] [12]

Real-time detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease using multi- head convolutional neural networks and a single inertial sensor,

L. Borz `ı, L. Sigcha, D. Rodr ´ıguez-Mart´ın, and G. Olmo, “Real-time detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease using multi- head convolutional neural networks and a single inertial sensor,” Artif. Intell. Med. , vol. 135, no. C, jan 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102459

work page doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102459 2023

[13] [13]

A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,

T. Chen, S. Kornblith, M. Norouzi, and G. Hinton, “A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations,” 2020

work page 2020

[14] [14]

Contrastive self- supervised learning for sensor-based human activity recognition,

B. Khaertdinov, E. Ghaleb, and S. Asteriadis, “Contrastive self- supervised learning for sensor-based human activity recognition,” in 2021 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–8

work page 2021

[15] [15]

Neonatal risk modeling and prediction,

A. Mamun, C.-C. Kuo, D. W. Britt, L. D. Devoe, M. I. Evans, H. Ghasemzadeh, and J. Klein-Seetharaman, “Neonatal risk modeling and prediction,” in 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–4

work page 2023

[16] [16]

Personalized modeling and detection of moments of cannabis use in free-living environments,

R. R. Azghan, N. C. Glodosky, R. K. Sah, C. Cuttler, R. McLaughlin, M. J. Cleveland, and H. Ghasemzadeh, “Personalized modeling and detection of moments of cannabis use in free-living environments,” in 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN), 2023, pp. 1–4

work page 2023

[17] [17]

Sensor data augmentation by resampling in contrastive learning for human activity recognition,

J. Wang, T. Zhu, J. Gan, L. L. Chen, H. Ning, and Y . Wan, “Sensor data augmentation by resampling in contrastive learning for human activity recognition,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 22 994–23 008, 2022

work page 2022

[18] [18]

Self-supervised contrastive learning for medical time series: A systematic review,

Z. Liu, A. Alavi, M. Li, and X. Zhang, “Self-supervised contrastive learning for medical time series: A systematic review,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 9, p. 4221, 2023

work page 2023

[19] [19]

Multimodal data for the detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease,

W. Zhang, Z. Yang, H. Li, D. Huang, L. Wang, Y . Wei, L. Zhang, L. Ma, H. Feng, J. Pan et al. , “Multimodal data for the detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease,” Scientific data, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022

work page 2022

[20] [20]

High-accuracy wearable detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease based on pseudo-multimodal features,

Y . Guo, D. Huang, W. Zhang, L. Wang, Y . Li, G. Olmo, Q. Wang, F. Meng, and P. Chan, “High-accuracy wearable detection of freezing of gait in parkinson’s disease based on pseudo-multimodal features,” Computers in Biology and Medicine , vol. 146, p. 105629, 2022

work page 2022

[21] [21]

Parkinson’s freezing of gait prediction,

A. Howard, A. Salomon, E. Gazit, HCL-Jevster, J. Hausdorff, L. Kirsch, Maggie, P. Ginis, R. Holbrook, and Y . F. Karim, “Parkinson’s freezing of gait prediction,” Kaggle, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //kaggle.com/competitions/tlvmc-parkinsons-freezing-gait-prediction

work page 2023

[22] [22]

Using wearable sensors and machine learning to automatically detect freezing of gait during a fog-provoking test,

T. Reches, M. Dagan, T. Herman, E. Gazit, N. A. Gouskova, N. Giladi, B. Manor, and J. M. Hausdorff, “Using wearable sensors and machine learning to automatically detect freezing of gait during a fog-provoking test,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 16, p. 4474, 2020

work page 2020

[23] [23]

Multitarget transcranial electrical stimulation for freezing of gait: a randomized controlled trial,

B. Manor, M. Dagan, T. Herman, N. A. Gouskova, V . G. Vanderhorst, N. Giladi, T. G. Travison, A. Pascual-Leone, L. A. Lipsitz, and J. M. Hausdorff, “Multitarget transcranial electrical stimulation for freezing of gait: a randomized controlled trial,” Movement Disorders , vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2693–2698, 2021

work page 2021

[24] [24]

A new rating instrument to assess festination and freezing gait in parkinsonian patients,

K. Ziegler, F. Schroeteler, A. O. Ceballos-Baumann, and U. M. Fietzek, “A new rating instrument to assess festination and freezing gait in parkinsonian patients,” Movement Disorders, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1012– 1018, 2010

work page 2010

[25] [25]

Machine learning approaches to metastasis bladder and secondary pulmonary cancer classification using gene expression data,

I. R. Rahman, S. B. Soumma, and F. B. Ashraf, “Machine learning approaches to metastasis bladder and secondary pulmonary cancer classification using gene expression data,” in 2022 25th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) , 2022, pp. 430–435

work page 2022

[26] [26]

Daphnet Freez- ing of Gait,

D. Roggen, M. Plotnik, and J. Hausdorff, “Daphnet Freez- ing of Gait,” UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24432/C56K78

work page doi:10.24432/c56k78 2010

[27] [27]

Mobile sensor data anonymization,

M. Malekzadeh, R. G. Clegg, A. Cavallaro, and H. Haddadi, “Mobile sensor data anonymization,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation , ser. IoTDI ’19. New York, NY , USA: ACM, 2019, pp. 49–58. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3302505.3310068

work page doi:10.1145/3302505.3310068 2019

[28] [28]

Cueing for people with parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait: a narrative review of the state-of-the-art and novel perspectives,

P. Ginis, E. Nackaerts, A. Nieuwboer, and E. Heremans, “Cueing for people with parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait: a narrative review of the state-of-the-art and novel perspectives,” Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 407–413, 2018

work page 2018

[29] [29]

Short-term and practice effects of metronome pacing in parkinson’s disease patients with gait freezing while in the ‘on’state: randomized single blind evaluation,

E. Cubo, S. Leurgans, and C. G. Goetz, “Short-term and practice effects of metronome pacing in parkinson’s disease patients with gait freezing while in the ‘on’state: randomized single blind evaluation,”Parkinsonism & related disorders, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 507–510, 2004

work page 2004

[30] [30]

Cueing for freezing of gait in patients with parkinson’s disease: a rehabilitation perspective,

A. Nieuwboer, “Cueing for freezing of gait in patients with parkinson’s disease: a rehabilitation perspective,” Movement disorders: official jour- nal of the Movement Disorder Society , vol. 23, no. S2, pp. S475–S481, 2008. SHOVITOet al.: SELF-SUPERVISED LEARNING AND OPPORTUNISTIC INFERENCE FOR CONTINUOUS MONITORING OF FREEZING OF GAIT IN PARKINSON’S DISE...

work page 2008