Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ProverbEval: Exploring LLM Evaluation Challenges for Low-resource Language Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.05049 v3 pith:B7MF5LI2 submitted 2024-11-07 cs.CL

ProverbEval: Exploring LLM Evaluation Challenges for Low-resource Language Understanding

classification cs.CL
keywords evaluationlanguageunderstandinglow-resourcetasksbenchmarkgenerationproverbeval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

With the rapid development of evaluation datasets to assess LLMs understanding across a wide range of subjects and domains, identifying a suitable language understanding benchmark has become increasingly challenging. In this work, we explore LLM evaluation challenges for low-resource language understanding and introduce \proverbeval, LLM evaluation benchmark for low-resource languages, focusing on low-resource language understanding in culture-specific scenarios. We benchmark various LLMs and explore factors that create variability in the benchmarking process. We observed performance variances of up to 50\%, depending on the order in which answer choices were presented in multiple-choice tasks. Native language proverb descriptions significantly improve tasks such as proverb generation, contributing to improved outcomes. Additionally, monolingual evaluations consistently outperformed their cross-lingual counterparts in generation tasks. We argue that special attention must be given to the order of choices, the choice of prompt language, task variability, and generation tasks when creating LLM evaluation benchmarks. Evaluation data available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/israel/ProverbEval, evaluation code https://github.com/EthioNLP/EthioProverbEval.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BRoverbs -- Measuring how much LLMs understand Portuguese proverbs

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    BRoverbs lets researchers test whether language models understand Portuguese proverbs; commercial models nearly master it, small models often guess randomly.