Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Position Paper: Model Access should be a Key Concern in AI Governance

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.00836 v1 pith:ZOG6UQFN submitted 2024-12-01 cs.CY

Position Paper: Model Access should be a Key Concern in AI Governance

classification cs.CY
keywords accessmodelgovernancedownstreamfieldgovernmentshelpingmake
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The downstream use cases, benefits, and risks of AI systems depend significantly on the access afforded to the system, and to whom. However, the downstream implications of different access styles are not well understood, making it difficult for decision-makers to govern model access responsibly. Consequently, we spotlight Model Access Governance, an emerging field focused on helping organisations and governments make responsible, evidence-based access decisions. We outline the motivation for developing this field by highlighting the risks of misgoverning model access, the limitations of existing research on the topic, and the opportunity for impact. We then make four sets of recommendations, aimed at helping AI evaluation organisations, frontier AI companies, governments and international bodies build consensus around empirically-driven access governance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Safeguards Based on Copyable Context Cannot Provide Reliable Safety for LLMs

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    With copyable pre-release evidence, any dual-use release rule that keeps legitimate utility q must leave worst-case attacker assistance at least Γ(q)>0, so useful capability, reliable safety, and open access cannot coexist.