Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Method for Evaluating Hyperparameter Sensitivity in Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.07165 v2 pith:FU3UN3TP submitted 2024-12-10 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords hyperparameterperformancesensitivitytuningchangesdifferentenvironmentslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The performance of modern reinforcement learning algorithms critically relies on tuning ever-increasing numbers of hyperparameters. Often, small changes in a hyperparameter can lead to drastic changes in performance, and different environments require very different hyperparameter settings to achieve state-of-the-art performance reported in the literature. We currently lack a scalable and widely accepted approach to characterizing these complex interactions. This work proposes a new empirical methodology for studying, comparing, and quantifying the sensitivity of an algorithm's performance to hyperparameter tuning for a given set of environments. We then demonstrate the utility of this methodology by assessing the hyperparameter sensitivity of several commonly used normalization variants of PPO. The results suggest that several algorithmic performance improvements may, in fact, be a result of an increased reliance on hyperparameter tuning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. How Should We Meta-Learn Reinforcement Learning Algorithms?

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic comparison of black-box evolution, neural and symbolic distillation, and LLM-based proposal for meta-learning RL algorithms yields practical recommendations: warm-started LLM proposal is sample-efficient,...

Pith tools