Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Dynamic Label Name Refinement for Few-Shot Dialogue Intent Classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.15603 v1 pith:GDQLDR2K submitted 2024-12-20 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords intentclassificationintentsdialoguesemanticapproachbaselineschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Dialogue intent classification aims to identify the underlying purpose or intent of a user's input in a conversation. Current intent classification systems encounter considerable challenges, primarily due to the vast number of possible intents and the significant semantic overlap among similar intent classes. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to few-shot dialogue intent classification through in-context learning, incorporating dynamic label refinement to address these challenges. Our method retrieves relevant examples for a test input from the training set and leverages a large language model to dynamically refine intent labels based on semantic understanding, ensuring that intents are clearly distinguishable from one another. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach effectively resolves confusion between semantically similar intents, resulting in significantly enhanced performance across multiple datasets compared to baselines. We also show that our method generates more interpretable intent labels, and has a better semantic coherence in capturing underlying user intents compared to baselines.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Selecting Open-Weight Language Models for Zero-Shot Intent Classification: A Systematic Evaluation of 41 Models

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across eight zero-shot intent datasets, instruction-tuned ~3B open-weight models can match or beat larger base models, top systems are statistically tied on MASSIVE, and SNIPS is saturated.

Pith tools