REVIEW 2 cited by
TensorGRaD: Tensor Gradient Robust Decomposition for Memory-Efficient Neural Operator Training
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
TensorGRaD: Tensor Gradient Robust Decomposition for Memory-Efficient Neural Operator Training
read the original abstract
Scientific problems require resolving multi-scale phenomena across different resolutions and learning solution operators in infinite-dimensional function spaces. Neural operators provide a powerful framework for this, using tensor-parameterized layers to capture complex, multi-dimensional relationships. However, scaling neural operators to high-resolution problems leads to significant computational demands, making the training of industrial-scale models prohibitive. In this work, we introduce \textbf{TensorGRaD}, a novel method that directly addresses the memory challenges associated with optimizing large tensor-structured weights. Our approach, based on a \texit{robust tensor decomposition}, factorizes gradients as the sum of a low-rank tensor and a sparse one to efficiently capture information within optimizer states, including outliers. Additionally, we provide a recipe for mixed precision training of TensorGRaD, achieving further memory savings without sacrificing accuracy. We showcase the effectiveness of TensorGRaD on Fourier Neural Operators, a class of models crucial for solving partial differential equations (PDE). We provide theoretical guarantees for TensorGRaD, demonstrating its fundamental advantage over matrix-based gradient compression methods. We empirically demonstrate large improvements across various PDE tasks, including the challenging turbulent Navier-Stokes case at a Reynolds number of $10^5$. TensorGRaD reduces total memory usage by over $50\%$ while maintaining and sometimes even improving accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
M+Adam: Low-Precision Training via Additive-Multiplicative Optimization
M+Adam combines additive and multiplicative update branches, avoiding low-precision rounding stalls and improving LLaMA-style pretraining perplexity compared with AdamW at BF16, FP8, and FP4 master-weight storage.
-
M+Adam: Low-Precision Training via Additive-Multiplicative Optimization
Combining additive and multiplicative Adam-style updates yields stable BF16/FP8/FP4 master-weight training and lower C4 perplexity than AdamW on 60M–1B LLaMA-style models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.